Assessing the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for preventing intravascular catheter-related infections

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F14%3AA1501D8Y" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/14:A1501D8Y - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Assessing the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for preventing intravascular catheter-related infections

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The study aimed at assessing the methodological quality of selected clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preventing intravascular catheter-related infections. CPGs were systematically searched in electronic databases and on websites of organizations,colleges and societies based on predefined criteria and keywords over a period of 2000-2013. After sorting and analyzing 104 documents, the methodological quality of three selected CPGs was assessed with the AGREE II generic instrument. All the CPGs obtained the highest domain scores in the dimensions Scope and Purpose (87%), Stakeholder Involvement (85%) and Clarity and Presentation (87%). Significantly lower scores were noted in the other domains, that is, Applicability (62%), Rigor of Development (55%) and Editorial Independence (30%). The highest overall methodological quality was observed in the Care and Maintenance to Reduce Vascular Access Complications (RNAO).

Název v anglickém jazyce

Assessing the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for preventing intravascular catheter-related infections

Popis výsledku anglicky

The study aimed at assessing the methodological quality of selected clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preventing intravascular catheter-related infections. CPGs were systematically searched in electronic databases and on websites of organizations,colleges and societies based on predefined criteria and keywords over a period of 2000-2013. After sorting and analyzing 104 documents, the methodological quality of three selected CPGs was assessed with the AGREE II generic instrument. All the CPGs obtained the highest domain scores in the dimensions Scope and Purpose (87%), Stakeholder Involvement (85%) and Clarity and Presentation (87%). Significantly lower scores were noted in the other domains, that is, Applicability (62%), Rigor of Development (55%) and Editorial Independence (30%). The highest overall methodological quality was observed in the Care and Maintenance to Reduce Vascular Access Complications (RNAO).

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AQ - Bezpečnost a ochrana zdraví, člověk – stroj

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery

ISSN

2336-3517

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

5

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

176-183

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—