Assessing the methodological quality of clinical guidelines for preventing falls of patients

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F16%3AA1701JKK" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/16:A1701JKK - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Assessing the methodological quality of clinical guidelines for preventing falls of patients

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aim: The study aimed to assess the methodological quality of selected clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preventing riskof falling in adult patients in acute and long-term institutional care. Design: Descriptive study using qualitative researchtechniques. Methods: CPGs were systematically searched in databases of clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, electronicdatabases, and websites of organizations and professional societies, based on predefined criteria and keywords fo the period2000?2015. After sorting and analysing 53 documents, the methodological quality of seven selected CPGs were assessed withthe AGREE II generic instrument. Results: All CPGs obtained highest domain scores in the dimensions Clarity andFramework, and Purpose, while the lowest standardized scores were achieved by the Applicability and Editorial independencedomains. The Rigor of development and Stakeholder Involvement domains achieved an average score. A total of threerecommended guidelines showed high methodological quality: Falls. Assessment and prevention of falls in older people ? 572b., 84 % (NICE, 2013); Preventing Falls and Harm From Falls in Older People. Best Practice Guidelines for AustralianHospitals ? 556 b., 84 % (ACSQHC, 2009); and Prevention of falls and fall injuries in the older adult ? 559 b., 82 % (RNAO,2005). Conclusion: Assessing the methodological quality of clinical guidelines using the AGREE instrument is one of the keysteps in the process of their adaptation for other socio-cultural and organizational conditions. It would be possible to adapt anduse all of the three most highly-rated CPGs to reduce risk of falling of inpatients in the Czech organizational and socio-culturalcontext

Název v anglickém jazyce

Assessing the methodological quality of clinical guidelines for preventing falls of patients

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aim: The study aimed to assess the methodological quality of selected clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preventing riskof falling in adult patients in acute and long-term institutional care. Design: Descriptive study using qualitative researchtechniques. Methods: CPGs were systematically searched in databases of clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, electronicdatabases, and websites of organizations and professional societies, based on predefined criteria and keywords fo the period2000?2015. After sorting and analysing 53 documents, the methodological quality of seven selected CPGs were assessed withthe AGREE II generic instrument. Results: All CPGs obtained highest domain scores in the dimensions Clarity andFramework, and Purpose, while the lowest standardized scores were achieved by the Applicability and Editorial independencedomains. The Rigor of development and Stakeholder Involvement domains achieved an average score. A total of threerecommended guidelines showed high methodological quality: Falls. Assessment and prevention of falls in older people ? 572b., 84 % (NICE, 2013); Preventing Falls and Harm From Falls in Older People. Best Practice Guidelines for AustralianHospitals ? 556 b., 84 % (ACSQHC, 2009); and Prevention of falls and fall injuries in the older adult ? 559 b., 82 % (RNAO,2005). Conclusion: Assessing the methodological quality of clinical guidelines using the AGREE instrument is one of the keysteps in the process of their adaptation for other socio-cultural and organizational conditions. It would be possible to adapt anduse all of the three most highly-rated CPGs to reduce risk of falling of inpatients in the Czech organizational and socio-culturalcontext

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AQ - Bezpečnost a ochrana zdraví, člověk – stroj

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NT14502" target="_blank" >NT14502: Vývoj a implementace klinického doporučeného postupu prevence pádů hospitalizovaných pacientů</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery

ISSN

2336-3517

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

7

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

549-557

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—