Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F18%3AA1901WDB" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/18:A1901WDB - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00843989:_____/19:E0107793 RIV/61988987:17110/19:A210262C

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85053676790&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Parastomal+and+incisional+hernia+following+laparoscopic%2fopen+abdominoperineal+resection%3a+is+there+a+real+difference%3f&st2=&sid=1ba680b1c5217b0ec" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85053676790&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Parastomal+and+incisional+hernia+following+laparoscopic%2fopen+abdominoperineal+resection%3a+is+there+a+real+difference%3f&st2=&sid=1ba680b1c5217b0ec</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: The aim of the present study was to explore incidence and severity of parastomal hernia (PSH) formation during the first 2 years after open/laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single institution. All patients who underwent laparoscopic/open APR for low rectal cancer within a 10-year study period were assessed for study eligibility. Results: In total, 148 patients were included in the study (97 patients after laparoscopic APR; 51 patients after open APR). There were no statistically significant differences between study subgroups regarding demographic and clinical features. The incidence of PSH detected by physical examination was significantly higher in patients after laparoscopic APR 1 year after the surgery (50.5% vs. 19.6%, p &lt; 0.001) and 2 years after the surgery (57.7% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.001). The incidence of radiologically detected PSH was significantly higher in laparoscopically operated patients after 1 year (58.7% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.007) and after 2 years (61.8% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.004). The mean diameter of PSH was similar in both study subgroups. The incidence of incisional hernia was significantly higher in patients who underwent open APR after 1 year (25.5% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.002) and after 2 years (31.3% vs. 7.2%, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: The risk of PSH development after laparoscopic APR appears to be significantly higher in comparison with patients undergoing open APR. Higher incidence of PSH should be considered a potential disadvantage of minimally invasive approach to patients with low rectal cancer. &#169; 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: The aim of the present study was to explore incidence and severity of parastomal hernia (PSH) formation during the first 2 years after open/laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single institution. All patients who underwent laparoscopic/open APR for low rectal cancer within a 10-year study period were assessed for study eligibility. Results: In total, 148 patients were included in the study (97 patients after laparoscopic APR; 51 patients after open APR). There were no statistically significant differences between study subgroups regarding demographic and clinical features. The incidence of PSH detected by physical examination was significantly higher in patients after laparoscopic APR 1 year after the surgery (50.5% vs. 19.6%, p &lt; 0.001) and 2 years after the surgery (57.7% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.001). The incidence of radiologically detected PSH was significantly higher in laparoscopically operated patients after 1 year (58.7% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.007) and after 2 years (61.8% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.004). The mean diameter of PSH was similar in both study subgroups. The incidence of incisional hernia was significantly higher in patients who underwent open APR after 1 year (25.5% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.002) and after 2 years (31.3% vs. 7.2%, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: The risk of PSH development after laparoscopic APR appears to be significantly higher in comparison with patients undergoing open APR. Higher incidence of PSH should be considered a potential disadvantage of minimally invasive approach to patients with low rectal cancer. &#169; 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30212 - Surgery

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

ISSN

0930-2794

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

—

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

9/2018

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85053676790