Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F19%3AA210262C" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/19:A210262C - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61988987:17110/18:A1901WDB RIV/00843989:_____/19:E0107793
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0.pdf" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to explore incidence and severity of parastomal hernia (PSH) formation during the first 2years after open/laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single institution. All patients who underwent laparoscopic/open APR for low rectal cancer within a 10-year study period were assessed for study eligibility.ResultsIn total, 148 patients were included in the study (97 patients after laparoscopic APR; 51 patients after open APR). There were no statistically significant differences between study subgroups regarding demographic and clinical features. The incidence of PSH detected by physical examination was significantly higher in patients after laparoscopic APR 1year after the surgery (50.5% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001) and 2years after the surgery (57.7% vs. 29.4%, p=0.001). The incidence of radiologically detected PSH was significantly higher in laparoscopically operated patients after 1year (58.7% vs. 35.3%, p=0.007) and after 2years (61.8% vs. 37.2%, p=0.004). The mean diameter of PSH was similar in both study subgroups. The incidence of incisional hernia was significantly higher in patients who underwent open APR after 1year (25.5% vs. 7.2%, p=0.002) and after 2years (31.3% vs. 7.2%, p<0.001).ConclusionsThe risk of PSH development after laparoscopic APR appears to be significantly higher in comparison with patients undergoing open APR. Higher incidence of PSH should be considered a potential disadvantage of minimally invasive approach to patients with low rectal cancer.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference?
Popis výsledku anglicky
BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to explore incidence and severity of parastomal hernia (PSH) formation during the first 2years after open/laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single institution. All patients who underwent laparoscopic/open APR for low rectal cancer within a 10-year study period were assessed for study eligibility.ResultsIn total, 148 patients were included in the study (97 patients after laparoscopic APR; 51 patients after open APR). There were no statistically significant differences between study subgroups regarding demographic and clinical features. The incidence of PSH detected by physical examination was significantly higher in patients after laparoscopic APR 1year after the surgery (50.5% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001) and 2years after the surgery (57.7% vs. 29.4%, p=0.001). The incidence of radiologically detected PSH was significantly higher in laparoscopically operated patients after 1year (58.7% vs. 35.3%, p=0.007) and after 2years (61.8% vs. 37.2%, p=0.004). The mean diameter of PSH was similar in both study subgroups. The incidence of incisional hernia was significantly higher in patients who underwent open APR after 1year (25.5% vs. 7.2%, p=0.002) and after 2years (31.3% vs. 7.2%, p<0.001).ConclusionsThe risk of PSH development after laparoscopic APR appears to be significantly higher in comparison with patients undergoing open APR. Higher incidence of PSH should be considered a potential disadvantage of minimally invasive approach to patients with low rectal cancer.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30212 - Surgery
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
ISSN
0930-2794
e-ISSN
1432-2218
Svazek periodika
33
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
5
Strana od-do
1789-1794
Kód UT WoS článku
000467688800010
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—