Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference?

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F19%3AA210262C" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/19:A210262C - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/61988987:17110/18:A1901WDB RIV/00843989:_____/19:E0107793

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0.pdf" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00464-018-6453-0</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference?

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to explore incidence and severity of parastomal hernia (PSH) formation during the first 2years after open/laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single institution. All patients who underwent laparoscopic/open APR for low rectal cancer within a 10-year study period were assessed for study eligibility.ResultsIn total, 148 patients were included in the study (97 patients after laparoscopic APR; 51 patients after open APR). There were no statistically significant differences between study subgroups regarding demographic and clinical features. The incidence of PSH detected by physical examination was significantly higher in patients after laparoscopic APR 1year after the surgery (50.5% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001) and 2years after the surgery (57.7% vs. 29.4%, p=0.001). The incidence of radiologically detected PSH was significantly higher in laparoscopically operated patients after 1year (58.7% vs. 35.3%, p=0.007) and after 2years (61.8% vs. 37.2%, p=0.004). The mean diameter of PSH was similar in both study subgroups. The incidence of incisional hernia was significantly higher in patients who underwent open APR after 1year (25.5% vs. 7.2%, p=0.002) and after 2years (31.3% vs. 7.2%, p<0.001).ConclusionsThe risk of PSH development after laparoscopic APR appears to be significantly higher in comparison with patients undergoing open APR. Higher incidence of PSH should be considered a potential disadvantage of minimally invasive approach to patients with low rectal cancer.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference?

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to explore incidence and severity of parastomal hernia (PSH) formation during the first 2years after open/laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR).MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single institution. All patients who underwent laparoscopic/open APR for low rectal cancer within a 10-year study period were assessed for study eligibility.ResultsIn total, 148 patients were included in the study (97 patients after laparoscopic APR; 51 patients after open APR). There were no statistically significant differences between study subgroups regarding demographic and clinical features. The incidence of PSH detected by physical examination was significantly higher in patients after laparoscopic APR 1year after the surgery (50.5% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001) and 2years after the surgery (57.7% vs. 29.4%, p=0.001). The incidence of radiologically detected PSH was significantly higher in laparoscopically operated patients after 1year (58.7% vs. 35.3%, p=0.007) and after 2years (61.8% vs. 37.2%, p=0.004). The mean diameter of PSH was similar in both study subgroups. The incidence of incisional hernia was significantly higher in patients who underwent open APR after 1year (25.5% vs. 7.2%, p=0.002) and after 2years (31.3% vs. 7.2%, p<0.001).ConclusionsThe risk of PSH development after laparoscopic APR appears to be significantly higher in comparison with patients undergoing open APR. Higher incidence of PSH should be considered a potential disadvantage of minimally invasive approach to patients with low rectal cancer.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30212 - Surgery

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES

  • ISSN

    0930-2794

  • e-ISSN

    1432-2218

  • Svazek periodika

    33

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    6

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    5

  • Strana od-do

    1789-1794

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000467688800010

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus