Categorization and challenges of utilitarianisms in the context of artificial intelligence

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17250%2F21%3AA22026VJ" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17250/21:A22026VJ - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-021-01169-1" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-021-01169-1</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01169-1" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00146-021-01169-1</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Categorization and challenges of utilitarianisms in the context of artificial intelligence

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The debates about ethics in the context of artificial intelligence have been recently focusing primarily on various types of utilitarianisms. This article suggests a categorization of the various presented utilitarianisms into static utilitarianisms and dynamic utilitarianisms. It explains the main features of both. Then, it presents the challenges the utilitarianisms in each group need to be able to deal with. Since it appears that those cannot be overcome in the context of each group alone, the article suggests a possibility of using a combination of the two categories of utilitarianisms to resolve most of the challenges without the need to abandon the concept of utilitarianisms as such. Even this possibility comes with its own issues that might not be resolved within the boundaries of utilitarianisms, however. Therefore, another potential alternative based on a combination of various ethical systems is suggested and briefly explored.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Categorization and challenges of utilitarianisms in the context of artificial intelligence

Popis výsledku anglicky

The debates about ethics in the context of artificial intelligence have been recently focusing primarily on various types of utilitarianisms. This article suggests a categorization of the various presented utilitarianisms into static utilitarianisms and dynamic utilitarianisms. It explains the main features of both. Then, it presents the challenges the utilitarianisms in each group need to be able to deal with. Since it appears that those cannot be overcome in the context of each group alone, the article suggests a possibility of using a combination of the two categories of utilitarianisms to resolve most of the challenges without the need to abandon the concept of utilitarianisms as such. Even this possibility comes with its own issues that might not be resolved within the boundaries of utilitarianisms, however. Therefore, another potential alternative based on a combination of various ethical systems is suggested and briefly explored.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

AI & Society: Knowledge, Culture and Communication

ISSN

0951-5666

e-ISSN

1435-5655

Svazek periodika

—

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Březen

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000626347800002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85102246495