Quentin Skinner’s Attempt to Clarify Collingwood

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17250%2F23%3AA2402KU1" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17250/23:A2402KU1 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz/index.php/tv/article/view/572" target="_blank" >https://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz/index.php/tv/article/view/572</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46938/tv.2023.572" target="_blank" >10.46938/tv.2023.572</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Quentin Skinner’s Attempt to Clarify Collingwood

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper examines the methodological propositions of Quentin Skinner, whose influence on intellectual history, including the history and philosophy of science (HPS), cannot be disregarded. It is well known that Skinner’s method is based on John L. Austin’s theory of speech acts. Nonetheless, the very idea of applying ordinary language philosophy to the subject matter of history rests on other assumptions that form Skinner’s philosophy of historiography. The paper focuses on reconstructing this philosophy of historiography and especially on R. G. Collingwood as a primary source of inspiration. This famous British philosopher, historian, and archaeologist authored many inspirational texts concerning the historical craft. The complex and sometimes contradictory structure of his posthumously published texts requires careful interpretation, and many philosophers see Collingwood as an obscure thinker. The paper argues that even though Skinner openly denounces Collingwood’s central concept of re-enactment, his philosophy of historiography is deeply influenced by a specific understanding of Collingwood’s legacy.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Quentin Skinner’s Attempt to Clarify Collingwood

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper examines the methodological propositions of Quentin Skinner, whose influence on intellectual history, including the history and philosophy of science (HPS), cannot be disregarded. It is well known that Skinner’s method is based on John L. Austin’s theory of speech acts. Nonetheless, the very idea of applying ordinary language philosophy to the subject matter of history rests on other assumptions that form Skinner’s philosophy of historiography. The paper focuses on reconstructing this philosophy of historiography and especially on R. G. Collingwood as a primary source of inspiration. This famous British philosopher, historian, and archaeologist authored many inspirational texts concerning the historical craft. The complex and sometimes contradictory structure of his posthumously published texts requires careful interpretation, and many philosophers see Collingwood as an obscure thinker. The paper argues that even though Skinner openly denounces Collingwood’s central concept of re-enactment, his philosophy of historiography is deeply influenced by a specific understanding of Collingwood’s legacy.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

TEORIE VĚDY / THEORY OF SCIENCE

ISSN

1210-0250

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

—

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

135-152

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85180484497