Universal History
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17250%2F25%3AA2603BIY" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17250/25:A2603BIY - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/encyclopedia-chapter?docid=b-9781350409231&tocid=b-9781350409231-chapter7&pdfid=9781350409231.ch-7.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/encyclopedia-chapter?docid=b-9781350409231&tocid=b-9781350409231-chapter7&pdfid=9781350409231.ch-7.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Universal History
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In this text, I deal with Universal History as a specific form of substantive philosophy of history that distinguishes itself from the historical sciences through certain ontological, epistemic, and formal principles. Ontologically, Universal History sees history as single whole that is unified by some unfolding principle that strives towards an end. This end is the Meaning of history, and the process towards it is to be represented in the form of a single interconnected story. Epistemically, universal historians use non-historiographic, a-priori, and introspective methods to establish these characteristics and the supposed Meaning of history. In particular, I discuss the theories of history of Saint Augustine and Bossuet, Kant and Schiller, and Big History different forms of Universal History (theological, Enlightenment, supposedly scientific). What they all have in common is that as Universal History they are not based on the evidentiary methods of the modern historical sciences and therefore do not produce knowledge of the past. Big History, though, is not just a form of Universal History, it also constitutes a proper historiographic approach and research programme.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Universal History
Popis výsledku anglicky
In this text, I deal with Universal History as a specific form of substantive philosophy of history that distinguishes itself from the historical sciences through certain ontological, epistemic, and formal principles. Ontologically, Universal History sees history as single whole that is unified by some unfolding principle that strives towards an end. This end is the Meaning of history, and the process towards it is to be represented in the form of a single interconnected story. Epistemically, universal historians use non-historiographic, a-priori, and introspective methods to establish these characteristics and the supposed Meaning of history. In particular, I discuss the theories of history of Saint Augustine and Bossuet, Kant and Schiller, and Big History different forms of Universal History (theological, Enlightenment, supposedly scientific). What they all have in common is that as Universal History they are not based on the evidentiary methods of the modern historical sciences and therefore do not produce knowledge of the past. Big History, though, is not just a form of Universal History, it also constitutes a proper historiographic approach and research programme.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
O - Projekt operacniho programu
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Bloomsbury Handbook of the Philosophy of the Historical Sciences and Big History
ISBN
978-1-3504-0919-4
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
137-154
Počet stran knihy
504
Název nakladatele
Bloomsbury Academic
Místo vydání
London
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—