Adaptive Variants of Differential Evolution: Towards Control-Parameter-Free Optimizers
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F12%3AA13014LJ" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/12:A13014LJ - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Adaptive Variants of Differential Evolution: Towards Control-Parameter-Free Optimizers
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Seven up-to-date adaptive variants of differential evolution were compared in six benchmark problems of two levels of dimension. The opposition-based optimization was also implemented to each adaptive variant and compared in experiments. It was found that all the algorithms perform very reliably in the problems of $D=30$ while their reliability rate in the problems of $D=100$ differs substantially among the test problems. Only two algorithms (JADE and textit{b6e6rl} variant of competitive DE) operate with acceptable reliability in all the problems. Considering the computational costs, the rank of the algorithms is different in various problems. When the average performance over all the problems is taken into account, JADE was the most efficient and textit{b6e6rl} the most reliable. The implementation of opposition-based optimization into adaptive variants of differential evolution do not increase the reliability and its positive influence on the efficiency is rare.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Adaptive Variants of Differential Evolution: Towards Control-Parameter-Free Optimizers
Popis výsledku anglicky
Seven up-to-date adaptive variants of differential evolution were compared in six benchmark problems of two levels of dimension. The opposition-based optimization was also implemented to each adaptive variant and compared in experiments. It was found that all the algorithms perform very reliably in the problems of $D=30$ while their reliability rate in the problems of $D=100$ differs substantially among the test problems. Only two algorithms (JADE and textit{b6e6rl} variant of competitive DE) operate with acceptable reliability in all the problems. Considering the computational costs, the rank of the algorithms is different in various problems. When the average performance over all the problems is taken into account, JADE was the most efficient and textit{b6e6rl} the most reliable. The implementation of opposition-based optimization into adaptive variants of differential evolution do not increase the reliability and its positive influence on the efficiency is rare.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
IN - Informatika
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/ED1.1.00%2F02.0070" target="_blank" >ED1.1.00/02.0070: Centrum excelence IT4Innovations</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2012
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Handbook of Optimization - From Classical to Modern Approach
ISBN
978-3-642-30503-0
Počet stran výsledku
27
Strana od-do
423-449
Počet stran knihy
1100
Název nakladatele
Springer-Verlag
Místo vydání
Berlin Heidelberg
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—