Expectations, disappointments and individual responses: imbalances in multilevel flood risk governance revealed by public survey

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F20%3AA2101ZTB" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/20:A2101ZTB - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/44555601:13440/20:43895439 RIV/44555601:13510/20:43895439

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jfr3.12615" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jfr3.12615</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12615" target="_blank" >10.1111/jfr3.12615</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Expectations, disappointments and individual responses: imbalances in multilevel flood risk governance revealed by public survey

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The recent paradigm shift toward multilevel flood risk management (FRM) has raised fundamental discussions about the potential of different entities to undertake specific FRM measures, as well as about the multiple effects of their efforts on other governance levels. Among the key questions being addressed are those related to the balance and possible inverse proportions between governmental efforts and motivation for individual action. In this paper, we use the results of a flood perception survey among individuals in two flood-prone Czech municipalities to reveal the discrepancies between the expectations of responsibility sharing and the actual willingness for individual flood risk reduction. While the results indicate strong expectations of the responsibilities of the governmental bodies for FRM, the respondents also expressed low confidence in completed FRM measures and strong self-reliance during floods and recovery. The willingness for individual FRM action is mostly limited to private insurance, whereas further long-term instruments are not favoured. The analysis also revealed differences between the two study areas, which indicates that, despite the current country-wide FRM policies based on the EU Floods Directive, the contextual factors and differential perception of scales of FRM measures and catchment complexity influence expectations of responsibility sharing

Název v anglickém jazyce

Expectations, disappointments and individual responses: imbalances in multilevel flood risk governance revealed by public survey

Popis výsledku anglicky

The recent paradigm shift toward multilevel flood risk management (FRM) has raised fundamental discussions about the potential of different entities to undertake specific FRM measures, as well as about the multiple effects of their efforts on other governance levels. Among the key questions being addressed are those related to the balance and possible inverse proportions between governmental efforts and motivation for individual action. In this paper, we use the results of a flood perception survey among individuals in two flood-prone Czech municipalities to reveal the discrepancies between the expectations of responsibility sharing and the actual willingness for individual flood risk reduction. While the results indicate strong expectations of the responsibilities of the governmental bodies for FRM, the respondents also expressed low confidence in completed FRM measures and strong self-reliance during floods and recovery. The willingness for individual FRM action is mostly limited to private insurance, whereas further long-term instruments are not favoured. The analysis also revealed differences between the two study areas, which indicates that, despite the current country-wide FRM policies based on the EU Floods Directive, the contextual factors and differential perception of scales of FRM measures and catchment complexity influence expectations of responsibility sharing

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Flood Risk Management

ISSN

1753-318X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

e12615

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

04/2020

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000527035800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85083670947