Mechanical Properties of Wooden Elements with 3D Printed Reinforcement from Polymers and Carbon

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27120%2F24%3A10254793" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27120/24:10254793 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/17/6/1244" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/17/6/1244</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma17061244" target="_blank" >10.3390/ma17061244</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Mechanical Properties of Wooden Elements with 3D Printed Reinforcement from Polymers and Carbon

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The research presented in this article aimed to investigate the differences in mechanical properties between solid structural timber and the same reinforced element in three different ways. A three-point bending test was performed on wood elements reinforced with carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP), 3D printed polycarbonate (3DPC) lamellas, and 3D printed polycarbonate with carbon fiber (3DPCCF) lamellas. In this comparison, the bending strength was large for CFRP samples, which have 8% higher performance than samples with 3DPCCF and 19% higher performance than samples with 3DPC. Conversely, when factoring in theoretical manufacturing costs, the performance of 3DPCCF is almost three times that of CFRP and 3DPC. In addition, 3D materials can be used for more complicated reinforcement shapes than those discussed in the paper.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Mechanical Properties of Wooden Elements with 3D Printed Reinforcement from Polymers and Carbon

Popis výsledku anglicky

The research presented in this article aimed to investigate the differences in mechanical properties between solid structural timber and the same reinforced element in three different ways. A three-point bending test was performed on wood elements reinforced with carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP), 3D printed polycarbonate (3DPC) lamellas, and 3D printed polycarbonate with carbon fiber (3DPCCF) lamellas. In this comparison, the bending strength was large for CFRP samples, which have 8% higher performance than samples with 3DPCCF and 19% higher performance than samples with 3DPC. Conversely, when factoring in theoretical manufacturing costs, the performance of 3DPCCF is almost three times that of CFRP and 3DPC. In addition, 3D materials can be used for more complicated reinforcement shapes than those discussed in the paper.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20102 - Construction engineering, Municipal and structural engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Materials

ISSN

1996-1944

e-ISSN

1996-1944

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

"neuvedeno"

Kód UT WoS článku

001192729200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85188860268