Methodology for Assessment of Electronic Payment Systems in Transport Using AHP Method
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F18%3A10238262" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/18:10238262 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-74454-4_28" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-74454-4_28</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74454-4_28" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-74454-4_28</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Methodology for Assessment of Electronic Payment Systems in Transport Using AHP Method
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The article deals with the choice of electronic payment systems in public transport. In this case, one of the expert methods of multicriteria evaluation of variants must be used. The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method was se-lected for evaluating the variants of electronic payment systems. This method is currently one of the most frequently used multicriteria assessment methods thanks its completeness, simplicity and wide range of uses. The method AHP us-es the decomposition of a complex unstructured situation into individual criteria, which are arranged in a hierarchical structure. This method was used to determine the weights of criteria that were set based on both carrier and passenger require-ments. Paired comparison method was used at each level of the hierarchical struc-ture to compare each criterion with the other criteria. The result of the comparison is the weight of the individual criteria. In the next subchapters of the article partial evaluation of variants of electronic payment systems was made, the synthesis of these evaluations was presented and the most suitable variant was chosen. Final-ly, the advantages and disadvantages of the AHP method and the recommenda-tions regarding its use in practice are mentioned.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Methodology for Assessment of Electronic Payment Systems in Transport Using AHP Method
Popis výsledku anglicky
The article deals with the choice of electronic payment systems in public transport. In this case, one of the expert methods of multicriteria evaluation of variants must be used. The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method was se-lected for evaluating the variants of electronic payment systems. This method is currently one of the most frequently used multicriteria assessment methods thanks its completeness, simplicity and wide range of uses. The method AHP us-es the decomposition of a complex unstructured situation into individual criteria, which are arranged in a hierarchical structure. This method was used to determine the weights of criteria that were set based on both carrier and passenger require-ments. Paired comparison method was used at each level of the hierarchical struc-ture to compare each criterion with the other criteria. The result of the comparison is the weight of the individual criteria. In the next subchapters of the article partial evaluation of variants of electronic payment systems was made, the synthesis of these evaluations was presented and the most suitable variant was chosen. Final-ly, the advantages and disadvantages of the AHP method and the recommenda-tions regarding its use in practice are mentioned.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20104 - Transport engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Volume 36
ISSN
2367-3370
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
36
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
24 January 2018
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
290-299
Kód UT WoS článku
000434081600028
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—