Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Methodology for Assessment of Electronic Payment Systems in Transport Using AHP Method

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F18%3A10238262" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/18:10238262 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-74454-4_28" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-74454-4_28</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74454-4_28" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-74454-4_28</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Methodology for Assessment of Electronic Payment Systems in Transport Using AHP Method

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The article deals with the choice of electronic payment systems in public transport. In this case, one of the expert methods of multicriteria evaluation of variants must be used. The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method was se-lected for evaluating the variants of electronic payment systems. This method is currently one of the most frequently used multicriteria assessment methods thanks its completeness, simplicity and wide range of uses. The method AHP us-es the decomposition of a complex unstructured situation into individual criteria, which are arranged in a hierarchical structure. This method was used to determine the weights of criteria that were set based on both carrier and passenger require-ments. Paired comparison method was used at each level of the hierarchical struc-ture to compare each criterion with the other criteria. The result of the comparison is the weight of the individual criteria. In the next subchapters of the article partial evaluation of variants of electronic payment systems was made, the synthesis of these evaluations was presented and the most suitable variant was chosen. Final-ly, the advantages and disadvantages of the AHP method and the recommenda-tions regarding its use in practice are mentioned.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Methodology for Assessment of Electronic Payment Systems in Transport Using AHP Method

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The article deals with the choice of electronic payment systems in public transport. In this case, one of the expert methods of multicriteria evaluation of variants must be used. The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method was se-lected for evaluating the variants of electronic payment systems. This method is currently one of the most frequently used multicriteria assessment methods thanks its completeness, simplicity and wide range of uses. The method AHP us-es the decomposition of a complex unstructured situation into individual criteria, which are arranged in a hierarchical structure. This method was used to determine the weights of criteria that were set based on both carrier and passenger require-ments. Paired comparison method was used at each level of the hierarchical struc-ture to compare each criterion with the other criteria. The result of the comparison is the weight of the individual criteria. In the next subchapters of the article partial evaluation of variants of electronic payment systems was made, the synthesis of these evaluations was presented and the most suitable variant was chosen. Final-ly, the advantages and disadvantages of the AHP method and the recommenda-tions regarding its use in practice are mentioned.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20104 - Transport engineering

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2018

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Volume 36

  • ISSN

    2367-3370

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    36

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    24 January 2018

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NL - Nizozemsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    10

  • Strana od-do

    290-299

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000434081600028

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus