Comparison of Deburring Technologies after Pipe Cutting

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F21%3A10248403" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/21:10248403 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.confer.cz/metal/2021/read/4161-comparison-of-deburring-technologies-after-pipe-cutting.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.confer.cz/metal/2021/read/4161-comparison-of-deburring-technologies-after-pipe-cutting.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.37904/metal.2021.4161" target="_blank" >10.37904/metal.2021.4161</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Deburring Technologies after Pipe Cutting

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the article, the technologies of deburring after pipe cutting are analyzed. The pipe cutting technologies and the external or internal burrs that are formed are described. The criteria of maximum productivity, minimum cost and maximum process stability were chosen for the comparison of the technologies of deburring of pipe ends. Since the essential advantage of both brushing and plastering technologies is the independence of the deburring process from the geometric accuracy of the pipe ends, a more detailed analysis of the two technologies and their mutual comparison was carried out. For the cost analysis of these technologies, pipes with a wall thickness of 0.6 mm and a production batch of 5,000 pieces were selected. Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that for the operation of deburring of split pipe surfaces, the plastering technology is preferable to the brushing method, within the range of possible technological applications. It is appropriate to use the brushing technology as a secondary technology for deburring the ends of pipes for which it is not possible or appropriate to use the plastering technology.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Deburring Technologies after Pipe Cutting

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the article, the technologies of deburring after pipe cutting are analyzed. The pipe cutting technologies and the external or internal burrs that are formed are described. The criteria of maximum productivity, minimum cost and maximum process stability were chosen for the comparison of the technologies of deburring of pipe ends. Since the essential advantage of both brushing and plastering technologies is the independence of the deburring process from the geometric accuracy of the pipe ends, a more detailed analysis of the two technologies and their mutual comparison was carried out. For the cost analysis of these technologies, pipes with a wall thickness of 0.6 mm and a production batch of 5,000 pieces were selected. Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that for the operation of deburring of split pipe surfaces, the plastering technology is preferable to the brushing method, within the range of possible technological applications. It is appropriate to use the brushing technology as a secondary technology for deburring the ends of pipes for which it is not possible or appropriate to use the plastering technology.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20301 - Mechanical engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

METAL 2021 : conference proceedings : 30th Anniversary International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials : May 26 - 28, 2021, Brno, Czech Republic, EU

ISBN

978-80-87294-99-4

ISSN

2694-9296

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

585-591

Název nakladatele

Tanger

Místo vydání

Ostrava

Místo konání akce

Brno

Datum konání akce

26. 5. 2021

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—