Sémantická informace a paradox inference

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F08%3A00018815" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/08:00018815 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Semantic Information and the Paradox of Inference

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In 1934 Cohen and Nagel put forward the well-known paradox of inference. The paradox is closely related to the problem of the informational yield of analytically and/or logically true sentences. The classical theory of semantic information (ESI), as formulated by Bar-Hillel and Carnap in 1952, does not give a satisfactory account of the problem of what information, if any, analytically and/or logically true sentences have to offer. According to ESI, the conclusion of a valid argument is contained in thepremises, and thus does not convey any novel information, and analytically/logically true sentences lack informational content. In 1970 Hintikka dubbed the failure of ESI to give an account of the informational yield of deductive inferences ?the scandalof deduction?. He made an attempt to obtain a measure of the informational yield by distinguishing between depth information and surface information. However, recently Sequoiah-Grayson has shown that Hintikka?s attempt fails. In this pap

Název v anglickém jazyce

Semantic Information and the Paradox of Inference

Popis výsledku anglicky

In 1934 Cohen and Nagel put forward the well-known paradox of inference. The paradox is closely related to the problem of the informational yield of analytically and/or logically true sentences. The classical theory of semantic information (ESI), as formulated by Bar-Hillel and Carnap in 1952, does not give a satisfactory account of the problem of what information, if any, analytically and/or logically true sentences have to offer. According to ESI, the conclusion of a valid argument is contained in thepremises, and thus does not convey any novel information, and analytically/logically true sentences lack informational content. In 1970 Hintikka dubbed the failure of ESI to give an account of the informational yield of deductive inferences ?the scandalof deduction?. He made an attempt to obtain a measure of the informational yield by distinguishing between depth information and surface information. However, recently Sequoiah-Grayson has shown that Hintikka?s attempt fails. In this pap

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

IN - Informatika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA401%2F07%2F0451" target="_blank" >GA401/07/0451: Sémantizace pragmatiky</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2008

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Jednotliviny, všeobecniny, významy

ISBN

978-80-969770-1-7

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

—

Název nakladatele

Slovenská akademie vied

Místo vydání

Bratislava, sk

Místo konání akce

Bratislava

Datum konání akce

10. 10. 2007

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—