Post-Fregean thoughts on propositional unity
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F12%3A86083919" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/12:86083919 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3983-3" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3983-3</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3983-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-94-007-3983-3</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Post-Fregean thoughts on propositional unity
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The current revival of the notion of structured meaning has made the problem of propositional unity pressing. The problem, stated in its simplest form, is how an individual a and a property F combine into the proposition P that a is an F. In general terms, how do two different kinds of objects combine into a third kind of object capable of having properties that neither of its constituents could have? Standard constraints imposed on P include that P must be capable of being true/false, being known/believed to be true/false, occurring as argument of propositional connectives (such as entailment), and figuring as the meaning of a sentence. This essay sketches how a theory of procedural semantics may offer a solution to the problem of the unity of the proposition. Procedural semantics contrasts with denotational semantics. Procedural semantics identifies meaning with the very procedure for producing a product, while denotational semantics identifies meaning with the product. The solution,
Název v anglickém jazyce
Post-Fregean thoughts on propositional unity
Popis výsledku anglicky
The current revival of the notion of structured meaning has made the problem of propositional unity pressing. The problem, stated in its simplest form, is how an individual a and a property F combine into the proposition P that a is an F. In general terms, how do two different kinds of objects combine into a third kind of object capable of having properties that neither of its constituents could have? Standard constraints imposed on P include that P must be capable of being true/false, being known/believed to be true/false, occurring as argument of propositional connectives (such as entailment), and figuring as the meaning of a sentence. This essay sketches how a theory of procedural semantics may offer a solution to the problem of the unity of the proposition. Procedural semantics contrasts with denotational semantics. Procedural semantics identifies meaning with the very procedure for producing a product, while denotational semantics identifies meaning with the product. The solution,
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AA - Filosofie a náboženství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2012
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Rationis defensor : essays in honour of Colin Cheyne
ISSN
0929-6425
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
28
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
neuvedeno
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
235-254
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—