Author evaluation based on h-index and citation response
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F16%3A86099067" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/16:86099067 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2016.100" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2016.100</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2016.100" target="_blank" >10.1109/INCoS.2016.100</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Author evaluation based on h-index and citation response
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
An accurate and fair assessment of the efficiency and impact of scientific work is, despite a lot of recent research effort, still an open problem. The measurement of quality and success of individual scientists and research groups can be approached from many different directions, none of which is universal. A reason for this is inherently different behavior of different scientists within the global research community. A complex evaluation of ones publication activities requires a careful consideration of a wide variety of factors. The well-known H-index is one of the most used bibliometric indices. Despite its many imperfections, its simplicity and ease of interpretation make it a popular scientometric method. This paper uses the ideas behind the H-index to analyze communities of authors who cite publishing scientists. A new author evaluation measure named aH-indexis proposed, and intuitive interpretations of its properties and semantics are presented. Preliminary experiments with authors with high H-index active in the area of computer science are presented to demonstrate the properties of the proposed measure. (C) 2016 IEEE.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Author evaluation based on h-index and citation response
Popis výsledku anglicky
An accurate and fair assessment of the efficiency and impact of scientific work is, despite a lot of recent research effort, still an open problem. The measurement of quality and success of individual scientists and research groups can be approached from many different directions, none of which is universal. A reason for this is inherently different behavior of different scientists within the global research community. A complex evaluation of ones publication activities requires a careful consideration of a wide variety of factors. The well-known H-index is one of the most used bibliometric indices. Despite its many imperfections, its simplicity and ease of interpretation make it a popular scientometric method. This paper uses the ideas behind the H-index to analyze communities of authors who cite publishing scientists. A new author evaluation measure named aH-indexis proposed, and intuitive interpretations of its properties and semantics are presented. Preliminary experiments with authors with high H-index active in the area of computer science are presented to demonstrate the properties of the proposed measure. (C) 2016 IEEE.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
IN - Informatika
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
8th International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS 2016) : proceedings papers
ISBN
978-1-5090-4123-7
ISSN
2470-9166
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
5
Strana od-do
375-379
Název nakladatele
IEEE
Místo vydání
New York
Místo konání akce
Ostrava
Datum konání akce
7. 9. 2016
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000386596100065