Comparison of different surgery operation techniques

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F16%3A86099271" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/16:86099271 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/61989100:27740/16:86099271

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7557148/" target="_blank" >http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7557148/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DT.2016.7557148" target="_blank" >10.1109/DT.2016.7557148</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of different surgery operation techniques

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This study proceeds from the database of two patient groups. Patients in first group underwent intraabdominal anastomotic operation technique and they come from a selected hospital in USA. Patients in second group underwent extraabdominal anastomotic operation technique and they come from the Clinic of Surgery at the University Hospital Ostrava (Czech Republic). Both groups have more than 200 patients. Both operation techniques are compared in the study taking into account the following variables: risk of post-operative morbidity, conversion, operation time, BMI, ASA, etc. Risk of morbidity will be quantified, compared for different patient groups and deeply discussed in the paper, by the use of advanced statistical methods, as logistic regression, Agresti-Coull and Wilson interval, hypotheses testing, etc. To be comparable both data groups had to be adapted and modified at the earliest by the use of a proper method based on propensity score.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of different surgery operation techniques

Popis výsledku anglicky

This study proceeds from the database of two patient groups. Patients in first group underwent intraabdominal anastomotic operation technique and they come from a selected hospital in USA. Patients in second group underwent extraabdominal anastomotic operation technique and they come from the Clinic of Surgery at the University Hospital Ostrava (Czech Republic). Both groups have more than 200 patients. Both operation techniques are compared in the study taking into account the following variables: risk of post-operative morbidity, conversion, operation time, BMI, ASA, etc. Risk of morbidity will be quantified, compared for different patient groups and deeply discussed in the paper, by the use of advanced statistical methods, as logistic regression, Agresti-Coull and Wilson interval, hypotheses testing, etc. To be comparable both data groups had to be adapted and modified at the earliest by the use of a proper method based on propensity score.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

BB - Aplikovaná statistika, operační výzkum

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LQ1602" target="_blank" >LQ1602: IT4Innovations excellence in science</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

IDT 2016 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies 2016

ISBN

978-1-4673-8860-3

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

48-53

Název nakladatele

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

Místo vydání

New York

Místo konání akce

Rzeszow

Datum konání akce

5. 7. 2016

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000389469300008