Risk of morbidity and other comparisons after surgeries at different operation techniques

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27740%2F15%3A86095673" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27740/15:86095673 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.crcnetbase.com/doi/abs/10.1201/b19094-266" target="_blank" >http://www.crcnetbase.com/doi/abs/10.1201/b19094-266</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b19094-266" target="_blank" >10.1201/b19094-266</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Risk of morbidity and other comparisons after surgeries at different operation techniques

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

At the beginning authors of the study had the use of database of two groups of patients: first group are patients from a selected hospital in USA that underwent intraabdominal anastomotic operation technique, second group are patients from Clinic of Surgery at the University Hospital Ostrava (Czech Republic) that underwent extraabdominal anastomotic operation technique. Both groups have more than 200 patients. Both operation techniques are compared in the study taking into account the following variables: risk of post-operative morbidity, conversion, operation time, BMI, ASA, etc. Risk of morbidity will be quantified, compared for different patient groups and deeply discussed in the paper, by the use of advanced statistical methods, as logistic regression, Agresti-Coull and Wilson Interval, hypoth- eses testing, etc. To be comparable both data groups had to be adapted and modified at the earliest by the use of a proper method based on propensity score.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Risk of morbidity and other comparisons after surgeries at different operation techniques

Popis výsledku anglicky

At the beginning authors of the study had the use of database of two groups of patients: first group are patients from a selected hospital in USA that underwent intraabdominal anastomotic operation technique, second group are patients from Clinic of Surgery at the University Hospital Ostrava (Czech Republic) that underwent extraabdominal anastomotic operation technique. Both groups have more than 200 patients. Both operation techniques are compared in the study taking into account the following variables: risk of post-operative morbidity, conversion, operation time, BMI, ASA, etc. Risk of morbidity will be quantified, compared for different patient groups and deeply discussed in the paper, by the use of advanced statistical methods, as logistic regression, Agresti-Coull and Wilson Interval, hypoth- eses testing, etc. To be comparable both data groups had to be adapted and modified at the earliest by the use of a proper method based on propensity score.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

BB - Aplikovaná statistika, operační výzkum

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/ED1.1.00%2F02.0070" target="_blank" >ED1.1.00/02.0070: Centrum excelence IT4Innovations</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Safety and reliability of complex engineered systems : proceedings of the 25th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2015, Zürich, Switzerland, 7-10 September 2015

ISBN

978-1-138-02879-1

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

2041-2047

Název nakladatele

CRC Press

Místo vydání

London

Místo konání akce

Curych

Datum konání akce

7. 9. 2015

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—