Comparison of impact of jpeg 2000 lossy compresion with ecw lossy compression to digital elevation model
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27350%2F12%3A86086602" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27350/12:86086602 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of impact of jpeg 2000 lossy compresion with ecw lossy compression to digital elevation model
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
When dealing with a large set of geodata it is always necessary to use compression algorithms to lower their size. There are several algorithms that can be used for aerial (satellite) photos. The algorithms with a best compression ratio are nowadays based on a wavelet technique. Although digital elevation models (DEM) in a GRID form are a bit different to aerial (satellite) photos the wavelet algorithms can be used for a compression of DEM. The compression can be loss or loss less. The paper describes a comparison of two formats based on wavelet algorithm. The first one is well known as JPEG 2000 and the second one is well known as ECW (Enhanced Compression Wavelet). The goal of this research was to determine how the loss compression (high ratio) impacts quality of DEM. OpenJPEG library in GDAL was used to produce JPEG 2000 compressed file and ERDAS ECW SDK was used to produce ECW compressed file. GRASS GIS was used to compare compressed files and the impact of the compression.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of impact of jpeg 2000 lossy compresion with ecw lossy compression to digital elevation model
Popis výsledku anglicky
When dealing with a large set of geodata it is always necessary to use compression algorithms to lower their size. There are several algorithms that can be used for aerial (satellite) photos. The algorithms with a best compression ratio are nowadays based on a wavelet technique. Although digital elevation models (DEM) in a GRID form are a bit different to aerial (satellite) photos the wavelet algorithms can be used for a compression of DEM. The compression can be loss or loss less. The paper describes a comparison of two formats based on wavelet algorithm. The first one is well known as JPEG 2000 and the second one is well known as ECW (Enhanced Compression Wavelet). The goal of this research was to determine how the loss compression (high ratio) impacts quality of DEM. OpenJPEG library in GDAL was used to produce JPEG 2000 compressed file and ERDAS ECW SDK was used to produce ECW compressed file. GRASS GIS was used to compare compressed files and the impact of the compression.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
JC - Počítačový hardware a software
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2012
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
33rd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2012, ACRS 2012. Volume 3
ISBN
978-1-62276-974-2
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
5
Strana od-do
1871-1875
Název nakladatele
[s.n.]
Místo vydání
[Thajsko]
Místo konání akce
Pattaya
Datum konání akce
26. 11. 2012
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—