Theoretical and experimental determination of a velocity profile under turbulent air flow in pipework
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27360%2F15%3A86095206" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27360/15:86095206 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Theoretical and experimental determination of a velocity profile under turbulent air flow in pipework
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper experimentally and theoretically analyses the velocity profile of air in laboratory stand pipework. Flow velocities measured using a hot-wire anemometer and a vane anemometer were compared with the results of numerical simulation. The k-? turbulence model was used in the numerical solution of flow rates and for determining the velocity profile using the ANSYS_CFX program. Using power law, this profile was described via an analytical function. Velocities determined by measuring with both instruments in the investigated place in the pipework showed lower values in comparison with the numerical solution. The cause of the difference in velocities was probably inaccurate stating of the volume flow of air through the ultrasonic anemometer. Measurements and simulation showed slight asymmetry in velocity which is related to an insufficiently large volume of the equalisation chamber and the mutual position of the input and output openings.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Theoretical and experimental determination of a velocity profile under turbulent air flow in pipework
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper experimentally and theoretically analyses the velocity profile of air in laboratory stand pipework. Flow velocities measured using a hot-wire anemometer and a vane anemometer were compared with the results of numerical simulation. The k-? turbulence model was used in the numerical solution of flow rates and for determining the velocity profile using the ANSYS_CFX program. Using power law, this profile was described via an analytical function. Velocities determined by measuring with both instruments in the investigated place in the pipework showed lower values in comparison with the numerical solution. The cause of the difference in velocities was probably inaccurate stating of the volume flow of air through the ultrasonic anemometer. Measurements and simulation showed slight asymmetry in velocity which is related to an insufficiently large volume of the equalisation chamber and the mutual position of the input and output openings.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
JG - Hutnictví, kovové materiály
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Manufacturing Technology
ISSN
1213-2489
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
15
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
5
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
5
Strana od-do
777-781
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—