Arbitration from Perspective of Right to Legal Protection and Right to Court Proceedings (the Right to Have One´s Case Dealt with by a Court): Significance of Autonomy and Scope of Right to Fair Trial

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F11%3A86080209" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/11:86080209 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Arbitration from Perspective of Right to Legal Protection and Right to Court Proceedings (the Right to Have One´s Case Dealt with by a Court): Significance of Autonomy and Scope of Right to Fair Trial

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the past, states hesitated to recognize decisions of foreign courts on political grounds, as such recognition de facto implied the acceptance of the authority of a foreign state. These obstacles were eliminated by private arbitration, and arbitration,as a means of dispute resolution that replaces state authority, has increasingly been employed where the latter has, for a variety of reasons, proven inefficient and defective. We must strictly distinguish between the right to court proceedings (the right to have one?s case dealt with by a court) and the right to legal protection. The right to court proceedings can be waived on the basis of the principle of the autonomy of will (for instance, by means of an arbitration agreement entered into in compliance with the lex arbitri). The right to legal protection cannot be waived. Arbitration is therefore a process of finding and applying the law. However, such legal protection must be approved by the law (laws and regulations) applicable at

Název v anglickém jazyce

Arbitration from Perspective of Right to Legal Protection and Right to Court Proceedings (the Right to Have One´s Case Dealt with by a Court): Significance of Autonomy and Scope of Right to Fair Trial

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the past, states hesitated to recognize decisions of foreign courts on political grounds, as such recognition de facto implied the acceptance of the authority of a foreign state. These obstacles were eliminated by private arbitration, and arbitration,as a means of dispute resolution that replaces state authority, has increasingly been employed where the latter has, for a variety of reasons, proven inefficient and defective. We must strictly distinguish between the right to court proceedings (the right to have one?s case dealt with by a court) and the right to legal protection. The right to court proceedings can be waived on the basis of the principle of the autonomy of will (for instance, by means of an arbitration agreement entered into in compliance with the lex arbitri). The right to legal protection cannot be waived. Arbitration is therefore a process of finding and applying the law. However, such legal protection must be approved by the law (laws and regulations) applicable at

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration. The Relationship between Constituional Values, Human Rights and Arbitration

ISBN

978-1-933833-71-2

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

47-70

Počet stran knihy

533

Název nakladatele

JurisPublishing Inc.

Místo vydání

Huntington, New York, U.S.A.

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—