Judgment scales and consistency measure in AHP

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F14%3A86090213" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/14:86090213 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00332-3" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00332-3</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00332-3" target="_blank" >10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00332-3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Judgment scales and consistency measure in AHP

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is widely used method in multiple-attribute decision making. In the recent literature many authors used different judgment scales which influenced the results and decisions. In this paper the author reviews and discusses effects of utilization of various judgment scales on priority estimation in AHP. There has been studies that have been concerned with the comparison of judgment scales but there were no studies concerned with consistency measures that are needed. Thegoal of this paper is to compare and discuss the application of various judgment scales on the results in particular practical example that has been used in previous paper by Saaty (2003). Thus the focus of the paper is to analyze the impact of using different judgment scales on the resulting priorities and consistency to default scale as proposed by Saaty. Results suggest that judgment scales have a profound impact on criteria priorities but not on ranking of criteria. However, the con

Název v anglickém jazyce

Judgment scales and consistency measure in AHP

Popis výsledku anglicky

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is widely used method in multiple-attribute decision making. In the recent literature many authors used different judgment scales which influenced the results and decisions. In this paper the author reviews and discusses effects of utilization of various judgment scales on priority estimation in AHP. There has been studies that have been concerned with the comparison of judgment scales but there were no studies concerned with consistency measures that are needed. Thegoal of this paper is to compare and discuss the application of various judgment scales on the results in particular practical example that has been used in previous paper by Saaty (2003). Thus the focus of the paper is to analyze the impact of using different judgment scales on the resulting priorities and consistency to default scale as proposed by Saaty. Results suggest that judgment scales have a profound impact on criteria priorities but not on ranking of criteria. However, the con

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AH - Ekonomie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Procedia Economics and Finance. Volume 12

ISBN

—

ISSN

2212-5671

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

"164?173"

Název nakladatele

Elsevier

Místo vydání

Amsterdam

Místo konání akce

Brno

Datum konání akce

6. 3. 2014

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000345439100019