Comparison of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approaches: Evaluating eGovernment Development

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F16%3A86097982" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/16:86097982 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approaches: Evaluating eGovernment Development

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper focuses on the comparison of selected multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of eGovernment development. Multiple criteria evaluation of alternatives is regarded as the basis of MCDM problems. The methods are defined as a set of techniques which aim to rank options, from the most preferred to the least preferred, with a view to supporting decision makers in their selection of the most appropriate alternative under uncertain circumstances. The application of the methods in practice therefore has great potential. As interest in the application of selected MCDM methods has grown, it has also come to encompass the issue of eGovernment development in terms of its ability to modernize public administration. The research in this article is based on the results of the following MCDM methods: WSA; TOPSIS; and MAPPAC. These methods are compared in terms of their applicability and reliability for the purpose of evaluating eGovernment development.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approaches: Evaluating eGovernment Development

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper focuses on the comparison of selected multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of eGovernment development. Multiple criteria evaluation of alternatives is regarded as the basis of MCDM problems. The methods are defined as a set of techniques which aim to rank options, from the most preferred to the least preferred, with a view to supporting decision makers in their selection of the most appropriate alternative under uncertain circumstances. The application of the methods in practice therefore has great potential. As interest in the application of selected MCDM methods has grown, it has also come to encompass the issue of eGovernment development in terms of its ability to modernize public administration. The research in this article is based on the results of the following MCDM methods: WSA; TOPSIS; and MAPPAC. These methods are compared in terms of their applicability and reliability for the purpose of evaluating eGovernment development.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EE2.3.20.0296" target="_blank" >EE2.3.20.0296: Výzkumný tým pro modelování ekonomických a finančních procesů na VŠB-TU Ostrava</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Littera Scripta

ISSN

1802-503X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

10-12

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—