Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

TOPSIS as Evaluation Tool of eGovernment Development in EU Member States

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F18%3A10243058" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/18:10243058 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://sgemsocial.org/ssgemlib/spip.php?article5782&lang=en" target="_blank" >https://sgemsocial.org/ssgemlib/spip.php?article5782&lang=en</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2018/1.2" target="_blank" >10.5593/sgemsocial2018/1.2</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    TOPSIS as Evaluation Tool of eGovernment Development in EU Member States

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The paper deals with the application of the methods of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) in the area of the eGovernment development evaluation. eGovernment is one of the current priority trends of public administration modernization in the European Union both at the level of the governing bodies of the EU and the individual member states. It is a way to government transformation in sense of increasing of the availability, effectiveness, transparency and accountability and one of the possible options how to provide better, cheaper and faster services and develop the participation of citizens at the public decision-making. This is the reason why the evaluation of eGovernment belongs to the theoretical and empirical approaches in the EU. The research is performed on data set across multiple data sources originating from various organizations (the European Commission, Eurostat and the United Nations). The goal of the presented research is to evaluate the eGovernment development in EU member states in 2013 and 2015 and to compare the results using TOPSIS method (The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution). The results of the eGovernment evaluation of the EU countries by TOPSIS method acknowledged the excellent condition of eGovernment primarily in Scandinavian countries. The worst state of eGovernment was reported in Romania, Bulgaria or Cyprus. The results of selected MCDM methods are very similar in both years.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    TOPSIS as Evaluation Tool of eGovernment Development in EU Member States

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The paper deals with the application of the methods of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) in the area of the eGovernment development evaluation. eGovernment is one of the current priority trends of public administration modernization in the European Union both at the level of the governing bodies of the EU and the individual member states. It is a way to government transformation in sense of increasing of the availability, effectiveness, transparency and accountability and one of the possible options how to provide better, cheaper and faster services and develop the participation of citizens at the public decision-making. This is the reason why the evaluation of eGovernment belongs to the theoretical and empirical approaches in the EU. The research is performed on data set across multiple data sources originating from various organizations (the European Commission, Eurostat and the United Nations). The goal of the presented research is to evaluate the eGovernment development in EU member states in 2013 and 2015 and to compare the results using TOPSIS method (The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution). The results of the eGovernment evaluation of the EU countries by TOPSIS method acknowledged the excellent condition of eGovernment primarily in Scandinavian countries. The worst state of eGovernment was reported in Romania, Bulgaria or Cyprus. The results of selected MCDM methods are very similar in both years.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50602 - Public administration

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2018

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts : SGEM 2018 : conference proceedings : 26 August - 01 September, 2018, Albena Co., Bulgaria. Volume 5. Issue 1.2

  • ISBN

    978-619-7408-62-1

  • ISSN

    2367-5659

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    8

  • Strana od-do

    355-362

  • Název nakladatele

    STEF92 Technology Ltd.

  • Místo vydání

    Sofia

  • Místo konání akce

    Albena

  • Datum konání akce

    26. 8. 2018

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku