Standards for Risk Management

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F16%3A86099733" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/16:86099733 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Standards for Risk Management

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Risk is present in our everyday life and risk management is universal but in most circumstances an unstructured activity, based on common sense, relevant knowledge, experience and instinct. Project management has evolved over recent years into a mature professional discipline characterized by a formalized body of knowledge and the definition of systematic processes for the execution of a project. All these and possibly other factors as well, have resulted in growing numbers of books, articles and conferences being devoted to project risk management. This level of activity has also led to the development of a number of standards that prescribe for and advise organisations on the best way to manage their risks. Every meaningful standard for project management contains project risk management as its important part. The goal of this essay is to present and compare the main standards for project risk management that are currently available today. Four international standards recognized world-wide were selected for comparison: . PMI, . PRINCE2, . IPMA, . ISO 31000 and IEC 62198. Chapter 1 introduces the article, basic principles and concepts of risk management. Chapter 2 consists of brief recapitulation of the selected standards in a manner that facilitates their comparison. This is followed by a comparison in chapter 3 including discussion regarding the commonalities among the standards. Chapter 4 contains the conclusion.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Standards for Risk Management

Popis výsledku anglicky

Risk is present in our everyday life and risk management is universal but in most circumstances an unstructured activity, based on common sense, relevant knowledge, experience and instinct. Project management has evolved over recent years into a mature professional discipline characterized by a formalized body of knowledge and the definition of systematic processes for the execution of a project. All these and possibly other factors as well, have resulted in growing numbers of books, articles and conferences being devoted to project risk management. This level of activity has also led to the development of a number of standards that prescribe for and advise organisations on the best way to manage their risks. Every meaningful standard for project management contains project risk management as its important part. The goal of this essay is to present and compare the main standards for project risk management that are currently available today. Four international standards recognized world-wide were selected for comparison: . PMI, . PRINCE2, . IPMA, . ISO 31000 and IEC 62198. Chapter 1 introduces the article, basic principles and concepts of risk management. Chapter 2 consists of brief recapitulation of the selected standards in a manner that facilitates their comparison. This is followed by a comparison in chapter 3 including discussion regarding the commonalities among the standards. Chapter 4 contains the conclusion.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

IBIMA : proceedings of the 28th conference : November 9-10, 2016, Seville, Spain

ISBN

978-0-9860419-8-3

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

3638-3657

Název nakladatele

IBIMA

Místo vydání

Norristown

Místo konání akce

Sevilla

Datum konání akce

9. 11. 2016

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000392785700367