CONFLICT BETWEEN WTO LEGAL ACTS AND EU LAW IN CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE, WITH FOCUS ON GATT AND TRIPS AGREEMENTS

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F20%3A10248217" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/20:10248217 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://lawinbusiness.vse.cz/wp-content/uploads/page/8/sbornik-2020_color-FINAL_WEB.pdf" target="_blank" >https://lawinbusiness.vse.cz/wp-content/uploads/page/8/sbornik-2020_color-FINAL_WEB.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

CONFLICT BETWEEN WTO LEGAL ACTS AND EU LAW IN CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE, WITH FOCUS ON GATT AND TRIPS AGREEMENTS

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

As far back as 1972, the European Court of Justice postulated that the provisions of the GATT could not be ascribed the same direct effect as secondary law. The Court determined that, under Community law, WTO rules have no direct effect, even in the wake of changes to the nature and spirit of conventions following the WTO&apos;s formation. Provisions establishing rights for EU citizens that they could exercise directly in court may be an exception, provided that the Community (EU) is bound by this international agreement. There are two exceptions applicable for international agreements to have direct effect (or for such direct effect to be denied): the clear reference exception and the transposition exception. In relation to the clear reference exception, secondary EU law explicitly refers to an international agreement. The transposition exception covers cases in which certain rules of secondary law are adopted to transpose rules of international law. Bearing in mind that the existence of the Community (EU) and its powers were established by primary acts that must be regarded as rules of international law, I find this interpretation highly questionable.

Název v anglickém jazyce

CONFLICT BETWEEN WTO LEGAL ACTS AND EU LAW IN CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE, WITH FOCUS ON GATT AND TRIPS AGREEMENTS

Popis výsledku anglicky

As far back as 1972, the European Court of Justice postulated that the provisions of the GATT could not be ascribed the same direct effect as secondary law. The Court determined that, under Community law, WTO rules have no direct effect, even in the wake of changes to the nature and spirit of conventions following the WTO&apos;s formation. Provisions establishing rights for EU citizens that they could exercise directly in court may be an exception, provided that the Community (EU) is bound by this international agreement. There are two exceptions applicable for international agreements to have direct effect (or for such direct effect to be denied): the clear reference exception and the transposition exception. In relation to the clear reference exception, secondary EU law explicitly refers to an international agreement. The transposition exception covers cases in which certain rules of secondary law are adopted to transpose rules of international law. Bearing in mind that the existence of the Community (EU) and its powers were established by primary acts that must be regarded as rules of international law, I find this interpretation highly questionable.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50200 - Economics and Business

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Právo v podnikání vybraných členských států EU : sborník příspěvků k XII. ročníku mezinárodní vědecké konference = Law in Business of Selected Member States of the European Union : proceedings of the XII international scientific conference : 6.11.2020

ISBN

978-80-88055-10-5

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

165-171

Název nakladatele

Troas, s.r.o.

Místo vydání

Praha

Místo konání akce

Praha

Datum konání akce

6. 11. 2020

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—