Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

A novel hybrid fuzzy PROMETHEE-IDEA approach to efficiency evaluation

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F21%3A10246129" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/21:10246129 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00500-020-05416-3.pdf" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00500-020-05416-3.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05416-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00500-020-05416-3</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    A novel hybrid fuzzy PROMETHEE-IDEA approach to efficiency evaluation

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Efficiency evaluation is a desirable kind of a decision making analysis for experts in various fields because if something can be measured, it can also be improved more easily. Measuring efficiency has been a topic of many research studies, and many quantitative methods to deal with this problem under various assumptions have already been established. However, most methods struggle with barriers limiting their use in practice. The aim of this paper is to establish a method for efficiency evaluation which is as traceable as possible, provides a graphical representation of the results, and yields results that are easily interpretable for problems with uncertain input data expressed by fuzzy evaluations. In particular, a new hybrid method for efficiency evaluation is presented. This method is based on a combination of the PROMETHEE (i.e. outranking multi-criteria decision making method) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) under uncertainty, similar to the study published by Ishizaka et al. (Soft Comput 22(22):7325-7338, 2018) who, however, worked only with deterministic data. The PROMETHEE method allows a computationally easy and traceable evaluation of alternatives. The DEA method is currently the most popular method for efficiency evaluation. However, its original version provides a graphical representation only for very simple models. In addition, the results are usually not easy to interpret because it mixes scale-dependent and scale-independent data together. Fuzziness in the DEA model is handled using measures of possibility and necessity, which provide easily interpretable results for a decision maker. In particular, the results reveal to what extent each unit under evaluation can possibly be, or certainly is, efficient. The proposed algorithm is applied to one artificial and one real-life numerical example, and the results are compared with the pure DEA model. (C) 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    A novel hybrid fuzzy PROMETHEE-IDEA approach to efficiency evaluation

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Efficiency evaluation is a desirable kind of a decision making analysis for experts in various fields because if something can be measured, it can also be improved more easily. Measuring efficiency has been a topic of many research studies, and many quantitative methods to deal with this problem under various assumptions have already been established. However, most methods struggle with barriers limiting their use in practice. The aim of this paper is to establish a method for efficiency evaluation which is as traceable as possible, provides a graphical representation of the results, and yields results that are easily interpretable for problems with uncertain input data expressed by fuzzy evaluations. In particular, a new hybrid method for efficiency evaluation is presented. This method is based on a combination of the PROMETHEE (i.e. outranking multi-criteria decision making method) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) under uncertainty, similar to the study published by Ishizaka et al. (Soft Comput 22(22):7325-7338, 2018) who, however, worked only with deterministic data. The PROMETHEE method allows a computationally easy and traceable evaluation of alternatives. The DEA method is currently the most popular method for efficiency evaluation. However, its original version provides a graphical representation only for very simple models. In addition, the results are usually not easy to interpret because it mixes scale-dependent and scale-independent data together. Fuzziness in the DEA model is handled using measures of possibility and necessity, which provide easily interpretable results for a decision maker. In particular, the results reveal to what extent each unit under evaluation can possibly be, or certainly is, efficient. The proposed algorithm is applied to one artificial and one real-life numerical example, and the results are compared with the pure DEA model. (C) 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/EE2.3.20.0296" target="_blank" >EE2.3.20.0296: Výzkumný tým pro modelování ekonomických a finančních procesů na VŠB-TU Ostrava</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Soft computing

  • ISSN

    1432-7643

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    25

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    5

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    17

  • Strana od-do

    3913-3929

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000594246000001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85096807752