Measuring the digital divide: A modified benefit-of-the-doubt approach
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F23%3A10251466" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/23:10251466 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705122012874?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705122012874?via%3Dihub</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110191" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110191</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Measuring the digital divide: A modified benefit-of-the-doubt approach
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In this paper, a modified composite index is developed to measure digital inclusion for a group of cities and regions. The developed model, in contrast to the existing benefit-of-the-doubt (BoD) composite index literature, considers the subindexes as non-compensatory. This new way of modeling results in three important properties: (i) all subindexes are taken into account when assessing the digital inclusion of regions and are not removed (substituted) from the composite index, (ii) in addition to an overall composite index (aggregation of the subindexes), partial indexes (aggregated scores for each subindex) are also provided so that weak performances can be detected more effectively than when only the overall index is measured, and (iii) compared with current BoD models, the developed model has improved discriminatory power. To demonstrate the developed model, we use the Australian digital inclusion index as a real-world example.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Measuring the digital divide: A modified benefit-of-the-doubt approach
Popis výsledku anglicky
In this paper, a modified composite index is developed to measure digital inclusion for a group of cities and regions. The developed model, in contrast to the existing benefit-of-the-doubt (BoD) composite index literature, considers the subindexes as non-compensatory. This new way of modeling results in three important properties: (i) all subindexes are taken into account when assessing the digital inclusion of regions and are not removed (substituted) from the composite index, (ii) in addition to an overall composite index (aggregation of the subindexes), partial indexes (aggregated scores for each subindex) are also provided so that weak performances can be detected more effectively than when only the overall index is measured, and (iii) compared with current BoD models, the developed model has improved discriminatory power. To demonstrate the developed model, we use the Australian digital inclusion index as a real-world example.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10102 - Applied mathematics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA19-13946S" target="_blank" >GA19-13946S: Hodnocení výkonnosti při výskytu neklasifikovaných faktorů</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Knowledge-Based Systems
ISSN
0950-7051
e-ISSN
1872-7409
Svazek periodika
261
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
February
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
110191
Kód UT WoS článku
000913901900001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85144419327