A comparison of proximity rules for surface planar flaws
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27690%2F19%3A10244423" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27690/19:10244423 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61989100:27690/19:10244425
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/PVP/proceedings-abstract/PVP2019/58929/V001T01A047/1068810" target="_blank" >https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/PVP/proceedings-abstract/PVP2019/58929/V001T01A047/1068810</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/PVP2019-93513" target="_blank" >10.1115/PVP2019-93513</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A comparison of proximity rules for surface planar flaws
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Flaw assessment according to Fitness-For-Service (FFS) codes is usually based on equations describing the impact of a single flaw in piping or pressure vessels components. However, when multiple flaws are detected, combination rules are to be taken into account to evaluate whether these flaws should be combined into a larger flaw or should be evaluated as separate ones. In recent years, numerous works have been done to evaluate the conservatism of the combination rules required by FFS codes and, if needed, establish new characterization rules. These new characterization rules are based on the distance between flaws, their depths, their lengths or a combination of these three parameters in order to reflect the level of interaction between adjacent flaws. A comparison, focusing on multiple surface planar flaws, between ASME B&PV Section XI current combination rules, other Fitness-For-Service codes and other combination rules established by fellow authors is presented in this paper. Copyright (C) 2019 ASME
Název v anglickém jazyce
A comparison of proximity rules for surface planar flaws
Popis výsledku anglicky
Flaw assessment according to Fitness-For-Service (FFS) codes is usually based on equations describing the impact of a single flaw in piping or pressure vessels components. However, when multiple flaws are detected, combination rules are to be taken into account to evaluate whether these flaws should be combined into a larger flaw or should be evaluated as separate ones. In recent years, numerous works have been done to evaluate the conservatism of the combination rules required by FFS codes and, if needed, establish new characterization rules. These new characterization rules are based on the distance between flaws, their depths, their lengths or a combination of these three parameters in order to reflect the level of interaction between adjacent flaws. A comparison, focusing on multiple surface planar flaws, between ASME B&PV Section XI current combination rules, other Fitness-For-Service codes and other combination rules established by fellow authors is presented in this paper. Copyright (C) 2019 ASME
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20501 - Materials engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP. Volume 1, 2019
ISBN
978-0-7918-5892-9
ISSN
0277-027X
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
10
Název nakladatele
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Místo vydání
New York
Místo konání akce
San Antonio
Datum konání akce
14. 7. 2019
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—