Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Treatment of the interaction with the free surface of the component for combined subsurface flaws: Technical basis for revision of IWA-3300 and table IWB/IWC-3510-1

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27690%2F20%3A10247240" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27690/20:10247240 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/PVP/proceedings-abstract/PVP2020/83815/V001T01A051/1089233" target="_blank" >https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/PVP/proceedings-abstract/PVP2020/83815/V001T01A051/1089233</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/PVP2020-21455" target="_blank" >10.1115/PVP2020-21455</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Treatment of the interaction with the free surface of the component for combined subsurface flaws: Technical basis for revision of IWA-3300 and table IWB/IWC-3510-1

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    When flaws are detected in pressure retaining components, assessments have to be done in order to demonstrate the fitness-for-service (FFS) of the component for continued operation. This FFS demonstration is performed in accordance with FFS Codes providing flaw assessment procedures and acceptance standards. Before performing analyses, a flaw characterization has to be carried out in order to determine unequivocally the flaw geometry. This flaw characterization is done according to rules provided in the FFS Codes and hence appears as crucial for the rest of the flaw assessment. The first step of the flaw characterization addresses the interaction of the flaw and the free surface of the component: if a subsurface flaw is located near the free surface, this step consists of characterizing the flaw as surface or subsurface according to subsurface-to-surface flaw proximity rules. The re-characterization process from subsurface to surface flaw is addressed in all fitness-for-service (FFS) Codes. The second step of the flaw characterization addresses the interaction of the flaw with adjacent flaws: if a flaw is located near another flaw, this step consists of combining the flaws between them according to flaw proximity rules. However, in some FFS Codes and in the ASME B&amp;PV Section XI Code particularly, there is a lack on how to treat the interaction of a combined flaw and the free surface of the component. The ASME B&amp;PV Section XI Code flaw characterization is not clear on this topic which could lead to misinterpretations and unreliable flaw assessment results. Some typical examples of unrealistic flaw assessment results due to these misinterpretations of the ASME B&amp;PV Code Section XI flaw characterization rules are depicted in this paper. After analyzing more in-depth the origin of the inconsistencies based on 3D Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) calculations, the paper is used as Technical Basis for the improvement of the ASME B&amp;PV Code Section XI in order to clarify the treatment of combined flaw in the flaw characterization (IWA-3300) and in the flaw acceptability assessment as well (IWB/IWC-3510-1).

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Treatment of the interaction with the free surface of the component for combined subsurface flaws: Technical basis for revision of IWA-3300 and table IWB/IWC-3510-1

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    When flaws are detected in pressure retaining components, assessments have to be done in order to demonstrate the fitness-for-service (FFS) of the component for continued operation. This FFS demonstration is performed in accordance with FFS Codes providing flaw assessment procedures and acceptance standards. Before performing analyses, a flaw characterization has to be carried out in order to determine unequivocally the flaw geometry. This flaw characterization is done according to rules provided in the FFS Codes and hence appears as crucial for the rest of the flaw assessment. The first step of the flaw characterization addresses the interaction of the flaw and the free surface of the component: if a subsurface flaw is located near the free surface, this step consists of characterizing the flaw as surface or subsurface according to subsurface-to-surface flaw proximity rules. The re-characterization process from subsurface to surface flaw is addressed in all fitness-for-service (FFS) Codes. The second step of the flaw characterization addresses the interaction of the flaw with adjacent flaws: if a flaw is located near another flaw, this step consists of combining the flaws between them according to flaw proximity rules. However, in some FFS Codes and in the ASME B&amp;PV Section XI Code particularly, there is a lack on how to treat the interaction of a combined flaw and the free surface of the component. The ASME B&amp;PV Section XI Code flaw characterization is not clear on this topic which could lead to misinterpretations and unreliable flaw assessment results. Some typical examples of unrealistic flaw assessment results due to these misinterpretations of the ASME B&amp;PV Code Section XI flaw characterization rules are depicted in this paper. After analyzing more in-depth the origin of the inconsistencies based on 3D Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) calculations, the paper is used as Technical Basis for the improvement of the ASME B&amp;PV Code Section XI in order to clarify the treatment of combined flaw in the flaw characterization (IWA-3300) and in the flaw acceptability assessment as well (IWB/IWC-3510-1).

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20301 - Mechanical engineering

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/EF17_048%2F0007373" target="_blank" >EF17_048/0007373: Predikce poškození konstrukčních materiálů</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP Volume 1, 2020

  • ISBN

    978-0-7918-8381-5

  • ISSN

    0277-027X

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    6

  • Strana od-do

    263-2

  • Název nakladatele

    American Society of Mechanical Engineers

  • Místo vydání

    New York

  • Místo konání akce

    New York

  • Datum konání akce

    3. 8. 2020

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku