Inter-observer reproducibility of 15 tests used for predicting difficult intubation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F11%3A33115962" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/11:33115962 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00098892:_____/11:#0000108

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Inter-observer reproducibility of 15 tests used for predicting difficult intubation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aim. To determine the inter-observer reproducibility of 15 tests used for predicting difficult tracheal intubation (DI). Material and methods. Following local ethics committee approval and informed consent, 101 volunteers were exam-ined by two assessorsusing 15 tests for predicting DI. The two assessors who were blinded to the results of the other, examined each volunteer independently. Cohen's kappa (kappa) or first-order agreement coefficient (AC1) were used to measure agreement between assessor ratings on a qualitative scale. Agreement between two quantitative outcomes was described using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's (PCC) or Spearman's (SCC) correlation coefficients. The following interpretation of the coefficients was used: poor ({ 0.20), fair (0.21-0.40), satisfactory (0.41-0.60), good (0.61-0.80), and excellent (0.81-1.00).

Název v anglickém jazyce

Inter-observer reproducibility of 15 tests used for predicting difficult intubation

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aim. To determine the inter-observer reproducibility of 15 tests used for predicting difficult tracheal intubation (DI). Material and methods. Following local ethics committee approval and informed consent, 101 volunteers were exam-ined by two assessorsusing 15 tests for predicting DI. The two assessors who were blinded to the results of the other, examined each volunteer independently. Cohen's kappa (kappa) or first-order agreement coefficient (AC1) were used to measure agreement between assessor ratings on a qualitative scale. Agreement between two quantitative outcomes was described using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's (PCC) or Spearman's (SCC) correlation coefficients. The following interpretation of the coefficients was used: poor ({ 0.20), fair (0.21-0.40), satisfactory (0.41-0.60), good (0.61-0.80), and excellent (0.81-1.00).

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FP - Ostatní lékařské obory

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NS9618" target="_blank" >NS9618: Epidemiologická studie predikce obtížné tracheální intubace v anesteziologii</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Biomedical Papers-Olomouc

ISSN

1213-8118

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

155

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

275-282

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—