Understanding the concept of missed nursing care from a cross-cultural perspective
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15120%2F19%3A73600647" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15120/19:73600647 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61988987:17110/19:A200223G
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jan.14189" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jan.14189</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.14189" target="_blank" >10.1111/jan.14189</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Understanding the concept of missed nursing care from a cross-cultural perspective
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Aims: To investigate how nursing experts and experts from other health professions understand the concept of rationing/missed/unfinished nursing care and how this is compared at a cross-cultural level. Design: The mixed methods descriptive study. Methods: The semi-structured questionnaires were sent to the sample of 45 scholars and practitioners from 26 countries. Data were collected from November 2017–February 2018. Results: Assigning average cultural values to participants from each country revealed three cultural groups: high individualism-high masculinity, high individualism-low masculinity and low individualism-medium masculinity. Content analysis of the findings revealed three main themes, which were identified across cultural clusters: (a) projecting blame for the phenomenon: Blaming the nurse versus blaming the system; (b) intentionality versus unintentionality; and (c) focus on nurses in comparison to focus on patients. Conclusion: Consistent differences in the understanding of missed nursing care can be understood in line with the nation's standing on two main cultural values: individualism and masculinity. Impact: The findings call for scholars' caution in interpreting missed nursing care from different cultures, or in comparing levels and types of missed nursing tasks across nations. The findings further indicated that mimicking interventions to limit missed nursing care from one cultural context to the other might be ineffective. Interventions to mitigate the phenomenon should be implemented thoughtfully, considering the cultural aspects.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Understanding the concept of missed nursing care from a cross-cultural perspective
Popis výsledku anglicky
Aims: To investigate how nursing experts and experts from other health professions understand the concept of rationing/missed/unfinished nursing care and how this is compared at a cross-cultural level. Design: The mixed methods descriptive study. Methods: The semi-structured questionnaires were sent to the sample of 45 scholars and practitioners from 26 countries. Data were collected from November 2017–February 2018. Results: Assigning average cultural values to participants from each country revealed three cultural groups: high individualism-high masculinity, high individualism-low masculinity and low individualism-medium masculinity. Content analysis of the findings revealed three main themes, which were identified across cultural clusters: (a) projecting blame for the phenomenon: Blaming the nurse versus blaming the system; (b) intentionality versus unintentionality; and (c) focus on nurses in comparison to focus on patients. Conclusion: Consistent differences in the understanding of missed nursing care can be understood in line with the nation's standing on two main cultural values: individualism and masculinity. Impact: The findings call for scholars' caution in interpreting missed nursing care from different cultures, or in comparing levels and types of missed nursing tasks across nations. The findings further indicated that mimicking interventions to limit missed nursing care from one cultural context to the other might be ineffective. Interventions to mitigate the phenomenon should be implemented thoughtfully, considering the cultural aspects.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30307 - Nursing
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LTC18018" target="_blank" >LTC18018: Přidělovaná ošetřovatelská péče ve vztahu k profesnímu pracovnímu prostředí sester</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
ISSN
0309-2402
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
75
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
11
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
2995-3005
Kód UT WoS článku
000492705000064
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85073827695