Defending Hume's Theory of Personal Identity and Discarding the Appendix
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F16%3A33159616" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/16:33159616 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.ostium.sk/sk/defending-humes-theory-of-personal-identity-and-discarding-the-appendix/" target="_blank" >http://www.ostium.sk/sk/defending-humes-theory-of-personal-identity-and-discarding-the-appendix/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Defending Hume's Theory of Personal Identity and Discarding the Appendix
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Since his contribution to the field of personal identity in 1738 Hume's theory has been debated thoroughly. Throughout the years there have been multiple critiques of Hume's theory, but despite the fact that all of these generally appear unsatisfactory, Hume's theory of personal identity is far from being a popular one in the field. I believe the blame partly falls on Hume himself. Hume's appendix to Treaties is most often read as expressing a deep concern regarding his own theory, and this concern, I believe, is to blame for his theory never gaining the respect it deserves. After all, why should we listen to Hume if he himself found his theory lacking? It is however a mistake to judge Hume's theory of personal identity, based on the appendix to Treaties. The appendix is far too ambiguity for any real conclusion and it offers nothing that cannot be found in the original chapter on personal identity from Treaties.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Defending Hume's Theory of Personal Identity and Discarding the Appendix
Popis výsledku anglicky
Since his contribution to the field of personal identity in 1738 Hume's theory has been debated thoroughly. Throughout the years there have been multiple critiques of Hume's theory, but despite the fact that all of these generally appear unsatisfactory, Hume's theory of personal identity is far from being a popular one in the field. I believe the blame partly falls on Hume himself. Hume's appendix to Treaties is most often read as expressing a deep concern regarding his own theory, and this concern, I believe, is to blame for his theory never gaining the respect it deserves. After all, why should we listen to Hume if he himself found his theory lacking? It is however a mistake to judge Hume's theory of personal identity, based on the appendix to Treaties. The appendix is far too ambiguity for any real conclusion and it offers nothing that cannot be found in the original chapter on personal identity from Treaties.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AA - Filosofie a náboženství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Ostium - internetový časopis pre humanitné odbory
ISSN
1336-6556
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
1-10
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—