Pedestrians’habits while crossing the road at a former zebra crossing
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F19%3A73591351" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/19:73591351 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333171237" target="_blank" >https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333171237</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/sps.2018090404" target="_blank" >10.17759/sps.2018090404</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Pedestrians’habits while crossing the road at a former zebra crossing
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper presents research results focused on pedestrians’ crossing behaviour, the role of habit and routine route choice, pedestrians’ perceived safety and comfort, preferences, and waiting times. Data was collected and analysed using rapid on-site interviews with pedestrians, on-site observations and video recordings. The results indicate that vulnerable pedestrians choose different crossing strategies: waiting for a driver to give way to them rather than waiting for a safe gap to pass, and require a much more cooperative approach from drivers than other pedestrians. The results of the study lead to the conclusion that the removal of the crossings reduced pedestrians’ perceived safety and comfort, on the other hand, their awareness has been raised. While adult pedestrians can cope with the new situation relatively well and cross the road without major difficulties, the same does not apply to vulnerable road users.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Pedestrians’habits while crossing the road at a former zebra crossing
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper presents research results focused on pedestrians’ crossing behaviour, the role of habit and routine route choice, pedestrians’ perceived safety and comfort, preferences, and waiting times. Data was collected and analysed using rapid on-site interviews with pedestrians, on-site observations and video recordings. The results indicate that vulnerable pedestrians choose different crossing strategies: waiting for a driver to give way to them rather than waiting for a safe gap to pass, and require a much more cooperative approach from drivers than other pedestrians. The results of the study lead to the conclusion that the removal of the crossings reduced pedestrians’ perceived safety and comfort, on the other hand, their awareness has been raised. While adult pedestrians can cope with the new situation relatively well and cross the road without major difficulties, the same does not apply to vulnerable road users.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50102 - Psychology, special (including therapy for learning, speech, hearing, visual and other physical and mental disabilities);
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Social Psychology and Society
ISSN
2221-1527
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
9
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
RU - Ruská federace
Počet stran výsledku
14
Strana od-do
33-46
Kód UT WoS článku
000456933500004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—