Some Notes on the usage of term "Arbitrariness of a Sign"
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F19%3A73600774" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/19:73600774 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
francouzština
Název v původním jazyce
Quelques Remarques sur l'Usage du Terme "l'Arbitraire du Signe"
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
"The arbitrariness of the sign" is described in the CLG as the first principle of the language. This term has become one of the major Saussurean legacies. Nevertheless, the arbitrariness of the sign has been received by the linguistic community with embarrassment, and the critics of this Saussurean concept have not been rare. In my paper, I would like to confront the arbitrariness of the sign as defined in the CLG with one of its most famous critics, that of Roman Jakobson [1971]. I would like to show that Jakobson's criticism is not based on valid arguments, in the sense that Jakobson uses the term "arbitrary" in some other way than it is used in the CLG. I propose to reread the passages of the CLG on the arbitrariness of the sign with a Hjelmslevean point of view, comprehending the language as a sublogic system. This approach will allow the coexistence of arbitrariness and motivation, exactly as in the CLG Saussure mentions onomatopoeia without ever denying the principle of arbitrariness of the sign. The language can be diagrammatic or iconic, without ceasing to be arbitrary.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Some Notes on the usage of term "Arbitrariness of a Sign"
Popis výsledku anglicky
"The arbitrariness of the sign" is described in the CLG as the first principle of the language. This term has become one of the major Saussurean legacies. Nevertheless, the arbitrariness of the sign has been received by the linguistic community with embarrassment, and the critics of this Saussurean concept have not been rare. In my paper, I would like to confront the arbitrariness of the sign as defined in the CLG with one of its most famous critics, that of Roman Jakobson [1971]. I would like to show that Jakobson's criticism is not based on valid arguments, in the sense that Jakobson uses the term "arbitrary" in some other way than it is used in the CLG. I propose to reread the passages of the CLG on the arbitrariness of the sign with a Hjelmslevean point of view, comprehending the language as a sublogic system. This approach will allow the coexistence of arbitrariness and motivation, exactly as in the CLG Saussure mentions onomatopoeia without ever denying the principle of arbitrariness of the sign. The language can be diagrammatic or iconic, without ceasing to be arbitrary.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60203 - Linguistics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
The Arbitrariness of the Sign in Question
ISBN
978-1-84890-313-5
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
283-294
Název nakladatele
College Publications
Místo vydání
Londýn
Místo konání akce
Ženeva, Švýcarsko
Datum konání akce
10. 1. 2017
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—