From Paracelsus to Universal Reform. The (Pseudo-) Paracelsian-Weigelian Philosophia Mystica (1618)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F20%3A73601121" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/20:73601121 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://brill.com/view/journals/daph/48/1-2/daph.48.issue-1-2.xml" target="_blank" >https://brill.com/view/journals/daph/48/1-2/daph.48.issue-1-2.xml</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/21971927-00601002" target="_blank" >10.1163/21971927-00601002</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

From Paracelsus to Universal Reform. The (Pseudo-) Paracelsian-Weigelian Philosophia Mystica (1618)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article analyses the content, context, and legacy of an influential collection of texts ascribed to Paracelsus (1493–1541) and Valentin Weigel (1533–1588). Published under the title Philosophia Mystica in 1618, it was one of the earliest printed publications of the theologica of Paracelsus. By combining Paracelsus and Weigel, the volume demonstrated their unified theological approach. Besides, it included two works by the promulgator of the “Theophrastia Sancta,” Adam Haslmayr (1560–1630), as well as a treatise by the alchemist Johann Siebmacher, who might have also been the editor of the whole volume. By using these sources the book indicated that Paracelsianism and Weigelianism were, basically, aiming at universal reform which connected them with the ethos of the Rosicrucian manifestos.

Název v anglickém jazyce

From Paracelsus to Universal Reform. The (Pseudo-) Paracelsian-Weigelian Philosophia Mystica (1618)

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article analyses the content, context, and legacy of an influential collection of texts ascribed to Paracelsus (1493–1541) and Valentin Weigel (1533–1588). Published under the title Philosophia Mystica in 1618, it was one of the earliest printed publications of the theologica of Paracelsus. By combining Paracelsus and Weigel, the volume demonstrated their unified theological approach. Besides, it included two works by the promulgator of the “Theophrastia Sancta,” Adam Haslmayr (1560–1630), as well as a treatise by the alchemist Johann Siebmacher, who might have also been the editor of the whole volume. By using these sources the book indicated that Paracelsianism and Weigelianism were, basically, aiming at universal reform which connected them with the ethos of the Rosicrucian manifestos.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-07439S" target="_blank" >GA19-07439S: Filosofie renesanční medicíny v Českých zemích (Jessenius - Hájek - Khunrath - Paracelsus). Nové přístupy a kontexty</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR

ISSN

0300-693X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2020, 48

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1-2

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

30

Strana od-do

184-213

Kód UT WoS článku

000528249100009

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85084788514