Process-Oriented Approach to Working with Body Symptoms

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F20%3A73604892" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/20:73604892 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.ibpj.org/issues/articles/Barbora%20Sedlakova,%20Tomas%20Dominik,%20Marek%20Kolarik%20-%20Process-Oriented%20Approach%20to%20Working%20with%20Body%20Symptoms.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.ibpj.org/issues/articles/Barbora%20Sedlakova,%20Tomas%20Dominik,%20Marek%20Kolarik%20-%20Process-Oriented%20Approach%20to%20Working%20with%20Body%20Symptoms.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Process-Oriented Approach to Working with Body Symptoms

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective. This study examines the effects of process-oriented approach to working with body symptoms on clients’ symptom severity, well-being, and satisfaction. Method. We used an additive design. Quantitative repeated measures were obtained from 67 participants randomized into experimental and control groups. Thirty-five participants from the experimental group underwent an experimental session by using Process-oriented Psychology, and were administered questionnaires immediately before, immediately after, and one week after the session. Thirty-two participants in the control group were administered questionnaires twice – one week apart, while no session was provided in the meantime. We used the following methods for data collection: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), Individual Symptoms Scale (ŠIP), and Outcome Rating Scale (ORS). The effect of process-oriented approach was assessed using a two-way ANOVA for repeated measures, supplemented by Tukey’s post-hoc test and descriptive statistics on subjective session rating scales. Results. Compared to the control group, the experimental group clients displayed a subjective alleviation of reported symptoms, a significantly larger improvement in subjective well-being, and higher satisfaction (in society) after the session. Conclusions. Process-oriented approach to working with body symptoms seems to be effective in reducing the severity of subjectively reported symptoms and increasing well-being and satisfaction in society.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Process-Oriented Approach to Working with Body Symptoms

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective. This study examines the effects of process-oriented approach to working with body symptoms on clients’ symptom severity, well-being, and satisfaction. Method. We used an additive design. Quantitative repeated measures were obtained from 67 participants randomized into experimental and control groups. Thirty-five participants from the experimental group underwent an experimental session by using Process-oriented Psychology, and were administered questionnaires immediately before, immediately after, and one week after the session. Thirty-two participants in the control group were administered questionnaires twice – one week apart, while no session was provided in the meantime. We used the following methods for data collection: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), Individual Symptoms Scale (ŠIP), and Outcome Rating Scale (ORS). The effect of process-oriented approach was assessed using a two-way ANOVA for repeated measures, supplemented by Tukey’s post-hoc test and descriptive statistics on subjective session rating scales. Results. Compared to the control group, the experimental group clients displayed a subjective alleviation of reported symptoms, a significantly larger improvement in subjective well-being, and higher satisfaction (in society) after the session. Conclusions. Process-oriented approach to working with body symptoms seems to be effective in reducing the severity of subjectively reported symptoms and increasing well-being and satisfaction in society.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Body Psychotherapy Journal

ISSN

2169-4745

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

43-55

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—