Revisiting Husserl’s Concept of Leib Using Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F21%3A73608410" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/21:73608410 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjp.12416" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjp.12416</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/SJP.12416" target="_blank" >10.1111/SJP.12416</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Revisiting Husserl’s Concept of Leib Using Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article reconsiders Husserl’s concept of Leib in light of Merleau-Ponty’s interpretation of the human body as an ontologically significant phenomenon. I first analyze Husserl’s account of the body as a “two-fold unity” and demonstrate the problematic nature of its four implications, namely, the ambiguous ontological status of the body as subject-object, the view of “my body” as “my object,” the preconstitutive character of the unity of the body, and the restriction of the constitution of the body to touch alone. Building on this analysis, I explain how Merleau-Ponty resolves the difficulties raised by Husserl’s account by reversing it. According to Merleau-Ponty, “flesh” is not a two-fold reality comprising subjective and objective aspects, but an ontological dimension from which these aspects can be abstracted through specific cognitive operations. Consequently, all subjective and objective aspects, even beyond the boundaries of one’s body, must be understood as founded in the indivisible unity of flesh. I argue that a thorough phenomenological description of the human body requires abandoning Husserl’s concept of Leib because it contributes to perpetuating subject-object dualism. In contrast, Merleau-Ponty’s notion of flesh reveals the circularity between subject and object and its general ontological significance.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Revisiting Husserl’s Concept of Leib Using Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article reconsiders Husserl’s concept of Leib in light of Merleau-Ponty’s interpretation of the human body as an ontologically significant phenomenon. I first analyze Husserl’s account of the body as a “two-fold unity” and demonstrate the problematic nature of its four implications, namely, the ambiguous ontological status of the body as subject-object, the view of “my body” as “my object,” the preconstitutive character of the unity of the body, and the restriction of the constitution of the body to touch alone. Building on this analysis, I explain how Merleau-Ponty resolves the difficulties raised by Husserl’s account by reversing it. According to Merleau-Ponty, “flesh” is not a two-fold reality comprising subjective and objective aspects, but an ontological dimension from which these aspects can be abstracted through specific cognitive operations. Consequently, all subjective and objective aspects, even beyond the boundaries of one’s body, must be understood as founded in the indivisible unity of flesh. I argue that a thorough phenomenological description of the human body requires abandoning Husserl’s concept of Leib because it contributes to perpetuating subject-object dualism. In contrast, Merleau-Ponty’s notion of flesh reveals the circularity between subject and object and its general ontological significance.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY

ISSN

0038-4283

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

59

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

33

Strana od-do

309-341

Kód UT WoS článku

000645898700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85105085814