In the cradle of laws: resolving coalition controversies in the executive phase of law-making

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F22%3A73614583" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/22:73614583 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14220/22:00126885

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-public-policy/article/in-the-cradle-of-laws-resolving-coalition-controversies-in-the-executive-phase-of-lawmaking/28AB0E4FDE64097F9D088FAB78C70CD2" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-public-policy/article/in-the-cradle-of-laws-resolving-coalition-controversies-in-the-executive-phase-of-lawmaking/28AB0E4FDE64097F9D088FAB78C70CD2</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X21000258" target="_blank" >10.1017/S0143814X21000258</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

In the cradle of laws: resolving coalition controversies in the executive phase of law-making

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Law-making in most parliamentary democracies is dominated by the executive. Yet so far, all research has focused on the parliamentary stage of law-making. Studies suggest that the changes to bills submitted by coalition governments are the result of coalition policies dealing with the agency loss caused by ministerial drift. This is puzzling because it is already easier and more effective for coalition parties to attempt to change the bills in the executive phase than in the parliamentary one. The article aims to close the knowledge gap, and it quantitatively explores the factors that facilitate changes during the understudied executive phase on case study of the Czech Republic. Analysis reveals that government bills are altered more during the executive phase than the parliamentary phase. While we find no significant impact caused by the distance to coalition compromise, the saliency of a bill for coalition partners has a negative influence on the ratio of changes.

Název v anglickém jazyce

In the cradle of laws: resolving coalition controversies in the executive phase of law-making

Popis výsledku anglicky

Law-making in most parliamentary democracies is dominated by the executive. Yet so far, all research has focused on the parliamentary stage of law-making. Studies suggest that the changes to bills submitted by coalition governments are the result of coalition policies dealing with the agency loss caused by ministerial drift. This is puzzling because it is already easier and more effective for coalition parties to attempt to change the bills in the executive phase than in the parliamentary one. The article aims to close the knowledge gap, and it quantitatively explores the factors that facilitate changes during the understudied executive phase on case study of the Czech Republic. Analysis reveals that government bills are altered more during the executive phase than the parliamentary phase. While we find no significant impact caused by the distance to coalition compromise, the saliency of a bill for coalition partners has a negative influence on the ratio of changes.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-03806S" target="_blank" >GA17-03806S: Odhalování temného koutu legislativního procesu: Příprava návrhů zákonů exekutivou</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Public Policy

ISSN

0143-814X

e-ISSN

1469-7815

Svazek periodika

42

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

489-508

Kód UT WoS článku

000779548600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85128385449