Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

A New Framework for Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: The Baseline Approach

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F22%3A73617954" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/22:73617954 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_3" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_3</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_3" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-93699-0_3</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    A New Framework for Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: The Baseline Approach

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This chapter proposes a new multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem formulation. We generalize the standard MCDM problem by assigning a specific role to one alternative from the pool of alternatives—to the one the decision maker is currently in possession of.We call this current solution a baseline.We propose that the baseline can be treated differently from the other alternatives and in fact can represent the reference solution for the whole decision-making problem. It can even serve as a basis for the determination or modification of criteria weights. The introduction of the baseline in MCDM problems allows for more customizability in the modeling of real-life decision-making. Two rules for criteria weight formation based on the baseline are introduced and discussed: Appreciating Possessed—weights of criteria are proportional to the satisfaction of the criteria by the baseline; Craving Unavailable—higher weights are assigned to those criteria that are less satisfied by the baseline while lower weights are assigned to criteria that the baseline satisfies better. Combining these two rules gives birth to several common behavioral effects, such as reluctance to switch to an alternative identical with the baseline; unwillingness to switch to a better alternative if satisfied with the baseline; endless switching between two alternatives in case of poor satisfaction; and seemingly exaggerated impact of a new feature introduction. The overall satisfaction with the baseline is quantified, however the specific role of the baseline alternative gives the name to the proposed approach. Overall, we provide a formal model for many real-life decision-making problems that are difficult to model under the standard MCDM problem formulation.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    A New Framework for Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: The Baseline Approach

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This chapter proposes a new multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem formulation. We generalize the standard MCDM problem by assigning a specific role to one alternative from the pool of alternatives—to the one the decision maker is currently in possession of.We call this current solution a baseline.We propose that the baseline can be treated differently from the other alternatives and in fact can represent the reference solution for the whole decision-making problem. It can even serve as a basis for the determination or modification of criteria weights. The introduction of the baseline in MCDM problems allows for more customizability in the modeling of real-life decision-making. Two rules for criteria weight formation based on the baseline are introduced and discussed: Appreciating Possessed—weights of criteria are proportional to the satisfaction of the criteria by the baseline; Craving Unavailable—higher weights are assigned to those criteria that are less satisfied by the baseline while lower weights are assigned to criteria that the baseline satisfies better. Combining these two rules gives birth to several common behavioral effects, such as reluctance to switch to an alternative identical with the baseline; unwillingness to switch to a better alternative if satisfied with the baseline; endless switching between two alternatives in case of poor satisfaction; and seemingly exaggerated impact of a new feature introduction. The overall satisfaction with the baseline is quantified, however the specific role of the baseline alternative gives the name to the proposed approach. Overall, we provide a formal model for many real-life decision-making problems that are difficult to model under the standard MCDM problem formulation.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50204 - Business and management

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    Intelligent Systems and Applications in Business and Finance

  • ISBN

    978-3-030-93699-0

  • Počet stran výsledku

    23

  • Strana od-do

    37-59

  • Počet stran knihy

    216

  • Název nakladatele

    Springer

  • Místo vydání

    Cham

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly