A Novel Approach for Group Decision Making Based on the Best-Worst Method (G-BWM): Application to Supply Chain Management
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F21%3A50018333" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/21:50018333 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/16/1881/htm" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/16/1881/htm</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math9161881" target="_blank" >10.3390/math9161881</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A Novel Approach for Group Decision Making Based on the Best-Worst Method (G-BWM): Application to Supply Chain Management
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Due to the complexity of real-world multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) issues, analyzing different opinions from a group of decision makers needs to ensure appropriate decision making. The group decision-making methods collect preferences of the decision makers and present the best preferences using mathematical equations. The best-worst method (BWM) is one of the recently introduced MCDM methods that requires fewer pairwise comparisons to obtain the criteria weights than the other MCDM methods. In this research, we develop a novel approach to group decision-making problems based on the BWM called G-BWM. This approach helps us to analyze the preferences of decision makers to carry out democratic decision making using the BWM structure. In order to assess the applicability of the proposed methodology and represent its novelty, two numerical examples from the literature with the application to supply chain management (SCM) (i.e., green supplier selection and supplier development/segmentation) are examined and discussed. The results demonstrate the performance of our proposed G-BWM for group decision making in terms of a large number of decision makers, ease of use and achieving democratic decisions in the decision-making process.
Název v anglickém jazyce
A Novel Approach for Group Decision Making Based on the Best-Worst Method (G-BWM): Application to Supply Chain Management
Popis výsledku anglicky
Due to the complexity of real-world multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) issues, analyzing different opinions from a group of decision makers needs to ensure appropriate decision making. The group decision-making methods collect preferences of the decision makers and present the best preferences using mathematical equations. The best-worst method (BWM) is one of the recently introduced MCDM methods that requires fewer pairwise comparisons to obtain the criteria weights than the other MCDM methods. In this research, we develop a novel approach to group decision-making problems based on the BWM called G-BWM. This approach helps us to analyze the preferences of decision makers to carry out democratic decision making using the BWM structure. In order to assess the applicability of the proposed methodology and represent its novelty, two numerical examples from the literature with the application to supply chain management (SCM) (i.e., green supplier selection and supplier development/segmentation) are examined and discussed. The results demonstrate the performance of our proposed G-BWM for group decision making in terms of a large number of decision makers, ease of use and achieving democratic decisions in the decision-making process.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10102 - Applied mathematics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
MATHEMATICS
ISSN
2227-7390
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
9
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
16
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
"Article Number: 1881"
Kód UT WoS článku
000690647600001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85112409992