The Category of Thirdness in the New Mechanical Philosophy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F23%3A73622223" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/23:73622223 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/lf-2023-0022" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/lf-2023-0022</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/lf-2023-0022" target="_blank" >10.2478/lf-2023-0022</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Category of Thirdness in the New Mechanical Philosophy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper discusses some of the possible connections between the principles of modeling in the new mechanical philosophy and the modeling used by Charles S. Peirce in his work on categories and evolutionary theory. The main goal is to show that the theoretical approaches used in the new mechanism can be beneficial for disciplines that are not clearly labelled as either humanities or natural science – for example, biosemiotics – and that this philosophical movement can help close the gap between natural science and the humanities. In individual chapters, this text deals with: the difference between the doctrine of the universal mechanism and the doctrine of the new mechanism, exploring the concept of the category of Thirdness and evolutionary theory in the work of Charles S. Peirce and finally focusing on the similarities between Peirce’s work and the approach of the new mechanical philosophy.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Category of Thirdness in the New Mechanical Philosophy

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper discusses some of the possible connections between the principles of modeling in the new mechanical philosophy and the modeling used by Charles S. Peirce in his work on categories and evolutionary theory. The main goal is to show that the theoretical approaches used in the new mechanism can be beneficial for disciplines that are not clearly labelled as either humanities or natural science – for example, biosemiotics – and that this philosophical movement can help close the gap between natural science and the humanities. In individual chapters, this text deals with: the difference between the doctrine of the universal mechanism and the doctrine of the new mechanism, exploring the concept of the category of Thirdness and evolutionary theory in the work of Charles S. Peirce and finally focusing on the similarities between Peirce’s work and the approach of the new mechanical philosophy.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Linguistic Frontiers

ISSN

2544-6339

e-ISSN

2544-6339

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

1-8

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—