Giovanni Pico’s warning against pantheistic implications in Ficino’s Neoplatonism

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F24%3A73622126" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/24:73622126 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17496977.2023.2281391" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17496977.2023.2281391</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2023.2281391" target="_blank" >10.1080/17496977.2023.2281391</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Giovanni Pico’s warning against pantheistic implications in Ficino’s Neoplatonism

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The famous controversy between Marsilio Ficino and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola is known to regard the proper use of Platonism in humanist and Christian context. With special attention to Pico’s Commentary on a Canzone, the point of disagreement with Ficino, which is not at all obvious, is examined through a close reading. The result is that Pico sees the temptation of a pantheistic and anthropocentric understanding of the relationship between thehuman realm and God. Whereas Ficino engaged in making pagan philosophy amenable to Christian theology, Pico was concerned with upholding the otherness of the divine. For the humanist agenda, Ficino made plausible that the human world is divinized, while Pico called for the ascent to God. In Pico’s view the Neoplatonists secularized the divine, as was evident in Ficino’s philosophical theology.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Giovanni Pico’s warning against pantheistic implications in Ficino’s Neoplatonism

Popis výsledku anglicky

The famous controversy between Marsilio Ficino and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola is known to regard the proper use of Platonism in humanist and Christian context. With special attention to Pico’s Commentary on a Canzone, the point of disagreement with Ficino, which is not at all obvious, is examined through a close reading. The result is that Pico sees the temptation of a pantheistic and anthropocentric understanding of the relationship between thehuman realm and God. Whereas Ficino engaged in making pagan philosophy amenable to Christian theology, Pico was concerned with upholding the otherness of the divine. For the humanist agenda, Ficino made plausible that the human world is divinized, while Pico called for the ascent to God. In Pico’s view the Neoplatonists secularized the divine, as was evident in Ficino’s philosophical theology.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA21-17059S" target="_blank" >GA21-17059S: Pantheismus a panpsychismus v renesanci a zrod sekularismu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Intellectual History Review

ISSN

1749-6977

e-ISSN

1749-6985

Svazek periodika

34

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

49-66

Kód UT WoS článku

001251189300010

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85180828227