Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Superficiary right of building - origin and development in Central Europe

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F16%3A33162331" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/16:33162331 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://www.eaco.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/petr.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.eaco.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/petr.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Superficiary right of building - origin and development in Central Europe

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The Czech Rebublic deals in last four years with a legal revolution in the field of private law. New Civil Code was adopted in 2012 and many new and forgotten legal figures were restored in the text of the code. An iteresting example of forgotten legal figures is the superficiary right of builiding which has entered again the legal order of the Czech Republic after long hundred years. Unlike the Act on the Superficiary Right of Building of 1912, the new Civil Code extends the scope of persons that may create the superficiary right of building to their land. This should eliminate the obstacle that substantially limited its wider use. The superficiary right of building is not likely to become a legal concept very frequently seen in public registers. The aim of this paper is, therefore, a reflection on divided ownership and the purpose and genesis of the superficiary right of building in relation to its origins, as well as a prediction of future developments of this legal concept in the real estate market. To analyse the concept, the paper employs formal and legal methods (logical, grammatical and historical method). A comparative study is conducted in the spirit of the comparative method. The superficiary right of building is a suitable complement to the range of options of property rights offered by the new Civil Code. The author concludes that the use of the superficiary right of building, although not limited in comparison with the 1912 Act, will likely be less frequent and focused on longer-term projects.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Superficiary right of building - origin and development in Central Europe

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The Czech Rebublic deals in last four years with a legal revolution in the field of private law. New Civil Code was adopted in 2012 and many new and forgotten legal figures were restored in the text of the code. An iteresting example of forgotten legal figures is the superficiary right of builiding which has entered again the legal order of the Czech Republic after long hundred years. Unlike the Act on the Superficiary Right of Building of 1912, the new Civil Code extends the scope of persons that may create the superficiary right of building to their land. This should eliminate the obstacle that substantially limited its wider use. The superficiary right of building is not likely to become a legal concept very frequently seen in public registers. The aim of this paper is, therefore, a reflection on divided ownership and the purpose and genesis of the superficiary right of building in relation to its origins, as well as a prediction of future developments of this legal concept in the real estate market. To analyse the concept, the paper employs formal and legal methods (logical, grammatical and historical method). A comparative study is conducted in the spirit of the comparative method. The superficiary right of building is a suitable complement to the range of options of property rights offered by the new Civil Code. The author concludes that the use of the superficiary right of building, although not limited in comparison with the 1912 Act, will likely be less frequent and focused on longer-term projects.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

  • CEP obor

    AG - Právní vědy

  • OECD FORD obor

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA15-08294S" target="_blank" >GA15-08294S: Dělené vlastnictví a jeho středoevropské konotace a perspektivy</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2016

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Danube : Law and Economics Review

  • ISSN

    1804-6746

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    2016

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CZ - Česká republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    10

  • Strana od-do

    131-140

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus