Walking a Tightrope - Looking Back on Risky Position of German Federal Constitutional Court in OMT Preliminary Question
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F16%3A33162811" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/16:33162811 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Walking a Tightrope - Looking Back on Risky Position of German Federal Constitutional Court in OMT Preliminary Question
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper analyzes the relevant parts of the OMT ruling 2014 of the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) with regard to the question whether FCC acted in conflict with its prior case law, respectively with its powers. Emphasis is placed first on issues relating to the concept of a constitutional complaint, which was accepted in the decision. The paper also analyzes the extent to which the previously defined criteria for ultra vires review were met in the decision. This is related to the issue of a preliminary reference and to the question of manifest exceeding of the competences by the EU. The article also deals with the issue of possible ordering of the constitutional organs by the Constitutional Court and with the concept of constitutional identity from the perspective of FCC.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Walking a Tightrope - Looking Back on Risky Position of German Federal Constitutional Court in OMT Preliminary Question
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper analyzes the relevant parts of the OMT ruling 2014 of the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) with regard to the question whether FCC acted in conflict with its prior case law, respectively with its powers. Emphasis is placed first on issues relating to the concept of a constitutional complaint, which was accepted in the decision. The paper also analyzes the extent to which the previously defined criteria for ultra vires review were met in the decision. This is related to the issue of a preliminary reference and to the question of manifest exceeding of the competences by the EU. The article also deals with the issue of possible ordering of the constitutional organs by the Constitutional Court and with the concept of constitutional identity from the perspective of FCC.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AG - Právní vědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Studies : the review of European law, economics and politics
ISSN
1805-8809
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
3
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
prosinec
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
27
Strana od-do
115-141
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—