Convention in the Times of Covid-19: Who is the Master of International Treaties?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F20%3A73606276" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/20:73606276 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://rozkotova.cld.bz/CYIL-vol-11-2020/32/" target="_blank" >https://rozkotova.cld.bz/CYIL-vol-11-2020/32/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Convention in the Times of Covid-19: Who is the Master of International Treaties?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper examines the current decision of the European Court of Human Rights to extend certain time-limits, including the six-months for lodging an application, due to the COVID-19 crisis. It has been first announced on 16 March and prolonged on 16 April for further two months, thus extending the time-limit for lodging applications fixed in the Convention by half. Neither of the two Press Releases informing the public about the measures contains any information regarding the entity which took the decision, whether it has been adopted unanimously and what legal basis it has. The paper discusses the measures in the context of the relevant provisions of international law, in particular Article 15 of the Convention and Article 62 of the Vienna Convention. The authors argue that even though the decision is understandable, it is, however, problematic in the light of international law and its fundamental principles.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Convention in the Times of Covid-19: Who is the Master of International Treaties?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper examines the current decision of the European Court of Human Rights to extend certain time-limits, including the six-months for lodging an application, due to the COVID-19 crisis. It has been first announced on 16 March and prolonged on 16 April for further two months, thus extending the time-limit for lodging applications fixed in the Convention by half. Neither of the two Press Releases informing the public about the measures contains any information regarding the entity which took the decision, whether it has been adopted unanimously and what legal basis it has. The paper discusses the measures in the context of the relevant provisions of international law, in particular Article 15 of the Convention and Article 62 of the Vienna Convention. The authors argue that even though the decision is understandable, it is, however, problematic in the light of international law and its fundamental principles.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law

ISSN

1805-0565

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

33-40

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85109684314