5G and Digital Sovereignty of the EU: The Slovak Way

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F21%3A73608370" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/21:73608370 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/bjes-2021-0013" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/bjes-2021-0013</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0013" target="_blank" >10.2478/bjes-2021-0013</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

5G and Digital Sovereignty of the EU: The Slovak Way

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Some recent views question the concept of sovereignty (especially the sovereignty of states), arguing that sovereignty is to be abandoned as a historical concept, because it existed in the world of the Westphalian system (created after 1648), where states were the major players, centers of power and objects of interest. Instead, we suggest that sovereignty should be perceived again as a “supreme power” (summa potestas), meaning a return to the pre-Bodinian concept of sovereignty and perceive it as a “power to exert control”. With regard to cyberspace, this does not mean direct control of all entities in the cyberspace, but only those that provide services which are perceived as “essential” or “critical” for the security and interests of the state. That is actually the approach taken with regard to ensuring the safety of 5G networks—through control imposed on the network operators, as required by the respective EU legislation and the EU Toolbox on 5G Networks specifically.

Název v anglickém jazyce

5G and Digital Sovereignty of the EU: The Slovak Way

Popis výsledku anglicky

Some recent views question the concept of sovereignty (especially the sovereignty of states), arguing that sovereignty is to be abandoned as a historical concept, because it existed in the world of the Westphalian system (created after 1648), where states were the major players, centers of power and objects of interest. Instead, we suggest that sovereignty should be perceived again as a “supreme power” (summa potestas), meaning a return to the pre-Bodinian concept of sovereignty and perceive it as a “power to exert control”. With regard to cyberspace, this does not mean direct control of all entities in the cyberspace, but only those that provide services which are perceived as “essential” or “critical” for the security and interests of the state. That is actually the approach taken with regard to ensuring the safety of 5G networks—through control imposed on the network operators, as required by the respective EU legislation and the EU Toolbox on 5G Networks specifically.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA20-27227S" target="_blank" >GA20-27227S: Vytváření, problémy a limity digitální suverenity Evropské unie</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

TALTECH JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES

ISSN

2674-4600

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

EE - Estonská republika

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

25-47

Kód UT WoS článku

999

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85120326579