Evidence in administrative proceedings - proof by audio-visual record, proof by the content of the website and other means of proof lacking an explicit regulation in the Code of Administrative Procedure

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F22%3A73617183" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/22:73617183 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://administrativescience.com/index.php/instadm/issue/view/4" target="_blank" >https://administrativescience.com/index.php/instadm/issue/view/4</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Evidence in administrative proceedings - proof by audio-visual record, proof by the content of the website and other means of proof lacking an explicit regulation in the Code of Administrative Procedure

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Evidence is one of the most important parts of any administrative procedure. The Czech Code of Administrative Procedure (hereinafter “Code”) contains the basic legal regulation of evidence in administrative proceedings and a demonstrative list of evidence. The administrative authorities are therefore not limited in the proceedings to the explicitly stated means of proof. However, the fundamental problem is that the Code regulates the implementation of only those means of proof which it expressly mentions. The Code is completely silent in relation to other means of proof and the course of their implementation. Nevertheless, in many cases, administrative authorities also need to take other means of proof (not regulated by the Code), in particular proof by means of audio-visual recording or proving the content of websites. The author will therefore focus on answering the questions that cause the greatest problems in this context in practice: “What rules must be followed in obtaining this evidence for it to be legal evidence? Under what conditions and by what procedure should the administrative authorities take this evidence? To what extent can analogy be followed in the implementation of this evidence?” The answers to these questions will be demonstrated mainly in relation to audio-visual evidence and the evidence of the content of the website. This is because of the evidence that is gaining in frequency and importance with regard to the development of modern society and information technology. Based on the analysis of the current administrative practice and case law, de lege ferenda proposals will also be formu-lated in relation to the current (non)regulation of this evidence in the Code.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Evidence in administrative proceedings - proof by audio-visual record, proof by the content of the website and other means of proof lacking an explicit regulation in the Code of Administrative Procedure

Popis výsledku anglicky

Evidence is one of the most important parts of any administrative procedure. The Czech Code of Administrative Procedure (hereinafter “Code”) contains the basic legal regulation of evidence in administrative proceedings and a demonstrative list of evidence. The administrative authorities are therefore not limited in the proceedings to the explicitly stated means of proof. However, the fundamental problem is that the Code regulates the implementation of only those means of proof which it expressly mentions. The Code is completely silent in relation to other means of proof and the course of their implementation. Nevertheless, in many cases, administrative authorities also need to take other means of proof (not regulated by the Code), in particular proof by means of audio-visual recording or proving the content of websites. The author will therefore focus on answering the questions that cause the greatest problems in this context in practice: “What rules must be followed in obtaining this evidence for it to be legal evidence? Under what conditions and by what procedure should the administrative authorities take this evidence? To what extent can analogy be followed in the implementation of this evidence?” The answers to these questions will be demonstrated mainly in relation to audio-visual evidence and the evidence of the content of the website. This is because of the evidence that is gaining in frequency and importance with regard to the development of modern society and information technology. Based on the analysis of the current administrative practice and case law, de lege ferenda proposals will also be formu-lated in relation to the current (non)regulation of this evidence in the Code.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Institutiones Administrationis

ISSN

2786-1929

e-ISSN

2786-1929

Svazek periodika

2

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

HU - Maďarsko

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

132-143

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—