Restriction of Religiously Insensitive Expressions in the Context of the Danish Cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed – When Experience Is Not Enough.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F25%3A73631587" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/25:73631587 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://karolinum.cz/casopis/auc-iuridica/rocnik-71/cislo-3/rok-2025/clanek-15212" target="_blank" >https://karolinum.cz/casopis/auc-iuridica/rocnik-71/cislo-3/rok-2025/clanek-15212</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2025.502" target="_blank" >10.14712/23366478.2025.502</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Restriction of Religiously Insensitive Expressions in the Context of the Danish Cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed – When Experience Is Not Enough.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The ECtHR, when assessing religiously offensive, inappropriate or blasphemous speech under Article 10 of the ECHR, uses the protection of religious peace as a legitimate reason for restricting freedom of expression. It associates this concept with the protection of the religious feelings of believers. The approach chosen by the ECtHR to the concept of the protection of religious peace is not appropriate. This article identifies conditions under which religiously offensive, inappropriate or blasphemous ways of exercising freedom of expression can constitute a disruption of peaceful coexistence. It discusses reactions to the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, which gradually led to the violent expression of disagreement among Muslims with their publication. The case draws attention to the question of whether it should be possible to restrict freedom of speech based on mere experience of violent reactions toreligiously insensitive speech.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Restriction of Religiously Insensitive Expressions in the Context of the Danish Cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed – When Experience Is Not Enough.

Popis výsledku anglicky

The ECtHR, when assessing religiously offensive, inappropriate or blasphemous speech under Article 10 of the ECHR, uses the protection of religious peace as a legitimate reason for restricting freedom of expression. It associates this concept with the protection of the religious feelings of believers. The approach chosen by the ECtHR to the concept of the protection of religious peace is not appropriate. This article identifies conditions under which religiously offensive, inappropriate or blasphemous ways of exercising freedom of expression can constitute a disruption of peaceful coexistence. It discusses reactions to the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, which gradually led to the violent expression of disagreement among Muslims with their publication. The case draws attention to the question of whether it should be possible to restrict freedom of speech based on mere experience of violent reactions toreligiously insensitive speech.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica

ISSN

0323-0619

e-ISSN

2336-6478

Svazek periodika

2025

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

195-210

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105020647567