Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

International Law and the Regulation of Resort to Force

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F25%3A73635815" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/25:73635815 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://brill.com/view/journals/rela/50/1-2/article-p1_001.xml?rskey=LeyGDL&result=1" target="_blank" >https://brill.com/view/journals/rela/50/1-2/article-p1_001.xml?rskey=LeyGDL&result=1</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10111" target="_blank" >10.1163/15730352-bja10111</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    International Law and the Regulation of Resort to Force

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This article situates the contemporary law on the use of force within the broader evolution of the UN Charter system of collective security, focusing in particular on the continued relevance and resilience of Article 2(4) despite sustained political and legal pressures. Drawing on discussions from an international conference on the future of jus ad bellum, the authors examine competing narratives portraying the prohibition of force either as enduring or as progressively eroded. The article identifies key structural challenges, including the increasing reliance on self-defence claims, interpretative ambiguities surrounding UN Security Council practice, technological developments such as cyber operations, and renewed controversies over humanitarian intervention and territorial acquisition. While acknowledging systemic strain, the authors argue that repeated violations ultimately reaffirm rather than undermine the normative significance of the prohibition. The article also maps the thematic contributions of the special issue, which address annexation, termination of armed conflict, collective self-defence and third-state support, neutrality law, and the role of domestic parliaments in reinforcing the prohibition of force. Overall, the article frames the jus ad bellum regime as undergoing adaptation rather than collapse, highlighting both continuity and transformation in the regulation of interstate force.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    International Law and the Regulation of Resort to Force

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This article situates the contemporary law on the use of force within the broader evolution of the UN Charter system of collective security, focusing in particular on the continued relevance and resilience of Article 2(4) despite sustained political and legal pressures. Drawing on discussions from an international conference on the future of jus ad bellum, the authors examine competing narratives portraying the prohibition of force either as enduring or as progressively eroded. The article identifies key structural challenges, including the increasing reliance on self-defence claims, interpretative ambiguities surrounding UN Security Council practice, technological developments such as cyber operations, and renewed controversies over humanitarian intervention and territorial acquisition. While acknowledging systemic strain, the authors argue that repeated violations ultimately reaffirm rather than undermine the normative significance of the prohibition. The article also maps the thematic contributions of the special issue, which address annexation, termination of armed conflict, collective self-defence and third-state support, neutrality law, and the role of domestic parliaments in reinforcing the prohibition of force. Overall, the article frames the jus ad bellum regime as undergoing adaptation rather than collapse, highlighting both continuity and transformation in the regulation of interstate force.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Review of Central and East European Law

  • ISSN

    0925-9880

  • e-ISSN

    1573-0352

  • Svazek periodika

    50

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1-2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NL - Nizozemsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    1-7

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001526701600001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105004329615