Videoconferencing as one of the possibilities for digitising administrative proceedings in the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F25%3A73636161" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/25:73636161 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Videoconferencing as one of the possibilities for digitising administrative proceedings in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This chapter aims to analyse the possibilities and limits of using videoconferencing in administrative proceedings in the Czech Republic. The basic research question is whether and under what conditions videoconferencing can be considered a procedurally admissible and constitutionally acceptable method of conducting oral proceedings. This question is followed by other sub-questions: how can videoconferencing ensure respect for the principles of immediacy, publicity and equality of participants in proceedings; what guarantees must be provided by law to prevent the procedural rights of participants from being curtailed; and finally, whether, from the point of view of the legal system, it is more appropriate to have a general regulation allowing videoconferencing with the possibility of exceptions laid down by special laws, or, on the contrary, to maintain the current model, where their use is regulated only on a case-by-case basis. The aim of the text is to provide a basis for de lege ferenda considerations on the general incorporation of videoconferencing into Czech administrative law.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Videoconferencing as one of the possibilities for digitising administrative proceedings in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
This chapter aims to analyse the possibilities and limits of using videoconferencing in administrative proceedings in the Czech Republic. The basic research question is whether and under what conditions videoconferencing can be considered a procedurally admissible and constitutionally acceptable method of conducting oral proceedings. This question is followed by other sub-questions: how can videoconferencing ensure respect for the principles of immediacy, publicity and equality of participants in proceedings; what guarantees must be provided by law to prevent the procedural rights of participants from being curtailed; and finally, whether, from the point of view of the legal system, it is more appropriate to have a general regulation allowing videoconferencing with the possibility of exceptions laid down by special laws, or, on the contrary, to maintain the current model, where their use is regulated only on a case-by-case basis. The aim of the text is to provide a basis for de lege ferenda considerations on the general incorporation of videoconferencing into Czech administrative law.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Public Administration: Purposes, Proce- dures and People
ISBN
978-80-7502-853-2
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
215-231
Počet stran knihy
440
Název nakladatele
Leges
Místo vydání
Praha
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—